| Labour move further right on 15:03 - Mar 2 with 1714 views | MattinLondon |
Seems logical - instead of analysing why a lot of left-leaning people turned to the Greens and then try to appeal to them. They try to woo Reform types who will never vote for Starmer. Totally logical from Labour. |  | |  |
| Labour move further right on 16:27 - Mar 2 with 1557 views | lowhouseblue |
| Labour move further right on 15:03 - Mar 2 by MattinLondon |
Seems logical - instead of analysing why a lot of left-leaning people turned to the Greens and then try to appeal to them. They try to woo Reform types who will never vote for Starmer. Totally logical from Labour. |
across all voters the top 3 issues are tackling the costs of living crisis, improving the nhs, and reducing immigration. you can pretend this isn't true of course, but if labour is to win again it needs to appeal to a good proportion of the 2/3rds of voters who see immigration as a priority issue. it needs to deliver of all 3 of the above. there's a group of far left voters who supported labour because of corbyn and now support the greens who it is impossible to ever see being part of an election winning alliance - many of the policies they support, including open borders however they might finesse that and leaving nato etc, are toxic to most of the rest of the electorate. again, you can pretend otherwise if you want. |  |
| And so as the loose-bowelled pigeon of time swoops low over the unsuspecting tourist of destiny, and the flatulent skunk of fate wanders into the air-conditioning system of eternity, I notice it's the end of the show |
| |
| Labour move further right on 16:37 - Mar 2 with 1526 views | J2BLUE |
| Labour move further right on 16:27 - Mar 2 by lowhouseblue |
across all voters the top 3 issues are tackling the costs of living crisis, improving the nhs, and reducing immigration. you can pretend this isn't true of course, but if labour is to win again it needs to appeal to a good proportion of the 2/3rds of voters who see immigration as a priority issue. it needs to deliver of all 3 of the above. there's a group of far left voters who supported labour because of corbyn and now support the greens who it is impossible to ever see being part of an election winning alliance - many of the policies they support, including open borders however they might finesse that and leaving nato etc, are toxic to most of the rest of the electorate. again, you can pretend otherwise if you want. |
Agree. Starmer has as little chance of getting the far left to vote for him as he does the far right.
As usual, people forget it's not a black and white issue. There are lots of people all along the political spectrum and Labour only need enough of those hovering around the middle third to win. |  |
| |
| Labour move further right on 16:42 - Mar 2 with 1487 views | eireblue |
| Labour move further right on 16:27 - Mar 2 by lowhouseblue |
across all voters the top 3 issues are tackling the costs of living crisis, improving the nhs, and reducing immigration. you can pretend this isn't true of course, but if labour is to win again it needs to appeal to a good proportion of the 2/3rds of voters who see immigration as a priority issue. it needs to deliver of all 3 of the above. there's a group of far left voters who supported labour because of corbyn and now support the greens who it is impossible to ever see being part of an election winning alliance - many of the policies they support, including open borders however they might finesse that and leaving nato etc, are toxic to most of the rest of the electorate. again, you can pretend otherwise if you want. |
55% of the population in favour of the death penalty.
Reform Party Voters: 82%
Evidence shows death penalty doesn’t deter criminals.
Lowhouse advice, make the death penalty party policy, so you can win. |  | | |
| Labour move further right on 17:06 - Mar 2 with 1413 views | J2BLUE |
| Labour move further right on 16:42 - Mar 2 by eireblue |
55% of the population in favour of the death penalty.
Reform Party Voters: 82%
Evidence shows death penalty doesn’t deter criminals.
Lowhouse advice, make the death penalty party policy, so you can win. |
They are supposed to represent the people aren't they?
And no, I don't support the death penalty and I don't think it would win if there was a referendum on it despite 55% of people saying yes when randomly asked in the street. | |
| |
| Labour move further right on 17:12 - Mar 2 with 1391 views | DanTheMan |
| Labour move further right on 17:06 - Mar 2 by J2BLUE |
They are supposed to represent the people aren't they?
And no, I don't support the death penalty and I don't think it would win if there was a referendum on it despite 55% of people saying yes when randomly asked in the street. |
If we did everything people wanted to the letter, the country would collapse in debt and people rarely want trade-offs.
Less tax, also better public services, also low immigration etc. |  |
| |
| Labour move further right on 17:22 - Mar 2 with 1362 views | J2BLUE |
| Labour move further right on 17:12 - Mar 2 by DanTheMan |
If we did everything people wanted to the letter, the country would collapse in debt and people rarely want trade-offs.
Less tax, also better public services, also low immigration etc. |
I'm not suggesting the public has a vote on some random app for every suggestion.
There is a lot of arrogance from some though that anything they don't agree with should be completely ignored. | |
| |
| Labour move further right on 17:33 - Mar 2 with 1323 views | iamatractorboy |
I notice the top two highest rates comments on that BBC article are very much in favour of this... but then I also notice they are suspiciously similarly worded, in fact parts are more or less verbatim. Bots? Anyway they are talking about only allowing people to stay who come here via legal means... are there any legal means?! Besides the one that was set up for Ukainians. |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Labour move further right on 17:37 - Mar 2 with 1303 views | eireblue |
| Labour move further right on 17:22 - Mar 2 by J2BLUE |
I'm not suggesting the public has a vote on some random app for every suggestion.
There is a lot of arrogance from some though that anything they don't agree with should be completely ignored. |
The is no arrogance. People can chose to vote for whatever they like.
However, what people may want is fewer murders and less crime.
It is a fact born out by lots of studies that criminals are not deterred by harsher sentences or the death penalties.
Easy policy, let’s do harsher sentences and fight about who is going to more harsh….something that has been done between parties.
Fact. U.K: faces a demographic time bomb, the amount of people working, can’t support the number of people not working. Wealth inequality has been rising since the 1980s
Fact Farage stated he would rather be poorer and have less immigration.
What do people actually want, fewer crimes, or more people executed?
Leadership is about producing fewer crimes, not getting votes for policies that don’t work.
Lots of people are following Farage.
It isn’t arrogant to disagree with the narrative that has been lead by Farage for 25 years, that used to be laughed at when wealth inequality was less. [Post edited 2 Mar 17:39]
| | | |
| Labour move further right on 17:56 - Mar 2 with 1217 views | BlacknGoldnBlue |
| Labour move further right on 16:27 - Mar 2 by lowhouseblue |
across all voters the top 3 issues are tackling the costs of living crisis, improving the nhs, and reducing immigration. you can pretend this isn't true of course, but if labour is to win again it needs to appeal to a good proportion of the 2/3rds of voters who see immigration as a priority issue. it needs to deliver of all 3 of the above. there's a group of far left voters who supported labour because of corbyn and now support the greens who it is impossible to ever see being part of an election winning alliance - many of the policies they support, including open borders however they might finesse that and leaving nato etc, are toxic to most of the rest of the electorate. again, you can pretend otherwise if you want. |
The main issues for most voters are:
cost of living
The NHS
the Economy
Immigration
And despite immigration being pushed as a political agenda for around 50 years by right wing parties its still only 25-30% that consider it the most important, approximately 60% of people feel immigration is positive for Britain, with 65% believing migrants bring valuable skills to the economy. Its not the vote winner that people think it is as the majority of people know its a positive but wish to see control over immigration.
I honestly believe the closer we get to a GE and the more the right wing parties are exposed the more people will realise they are unelectable. I also believe if Labour want a second term they need to be looking left rather than competing for the saturated middle ground and right wing! |  |
| |
| Labour move further right on 17:58 - Mar 2 with 1191 views | lowhouseblue |
| Labour move further right on 16:42 - Mar 2 by eireblue |
55% of the population in favour of the death penalty.
Reform Party Voters: 82%
Evidence shows death penalty doesn’t deter criminals.
Lowhouse advice, make the death penalty party policy, so you can win. |
whatever their views, the death penalty doesn't determine how people vote - reducing immigration does. people have views on all sorts of peripheral stuff - in terms of how they actually vote however the key determinants are the cost of living, the state of the nhs, and reducing immigration. | |
| And so as the loose-bowelled pigeon of time swoops low over the unsuspecting tourist of destiny, and the flatulent skunk of fate wanders into the air-conditioning system of eternity, I notice it's the end of the show |
| |
| Labour move further right on 18:04 - Mar 2 with 1159 views | lowhouseblue |
| Labour move further right on 17:56 - Mar 2 by BlacknGoldnBlue |
The main issues for most voters are:
cost of living
The NHS
the Economy
Immigration
And despite immigration being pushed as a political agenda for around 50 years by right wing parties its still only 25-30% that consider it the most important, approximately 60% of people feel immigration is positive for Britain, with 65% believing migrants bring valuable skills to the economy. Its not the vote winner that people think it is as the majority of people know its a positive but wish to see control over immigration.
I honestly believe the closer we get to a GE and the more the right wing parties are exposed the more people will realise they are unelectable. I also believe if Labour want a second term they need to be looking left rather than competing for the saturated middle ground and right wing! |
60% of people feeling that immigration is positive and brings valuable skills is in no way incompatible with an even larger number thinking that it is now too high and isn't being properly controlled. we've had many decades of the vast majority of the population being positive and welcoming about immigration - it is something very positive about british attitudes. but that was when net immigration was c. 100,000 and integration was effective. very very sadly the last decade has broken that consensus. for a large majority of the population you can have too much of even a good thing. | |
| And so as the loose-bowelled pigeon of time swoops low over the unsuspecting tourist of destiny, and the flatulent skunk of fate wanders into the air-conditioning system of eternity, I notice it's the end of the show |
| |
| Labour move further right on 18:17 - Mar 2 with 1121 views | J2BLUE |
| Labour move further right on 17:37 - Mar 2 by eireblue |
The is no arrogance. People can chose to vote for whatever they like.
However, what people may want is fewer murders and less crime.
It is a fact born out by lots of studies that criminals are not deterred by harsher sentences or the death penalties.
Easy policy, let’s do harsher sentences and fight about who is going to more harsh….something that has been done between parties.
Fact. U.K: faces a demographic time bomb, the amount of people working, can’t support the number of people not working. Wealth inequality has been rising since the 1980s
Fact Farage stated he would rather be poorer and have less immigration.
What do people actually want, fewer crimes, or more people executed?
Leadership is about producing fewer crimes, not getting votes for policies that don’t work.
Lots of people are following Farage.
It isn’t arrogant to disagree with the narrative that has been lead by Farage for 25 years, that used to be laughed at when wealth inequality was less. [Post edited 2 Mar 17:39]
|
Do people support it to reduce crime? It seems to me they support it because they want revenge and to avoid paying to keep that person for the rest of their life.
I doubt they would support it as strongly once they find out you can sit on death row for decades and the legal appeals cost a fortune. | |
| |
| Labour move further right on 18:22 - Mar 2 with 1091 views | reusersfreekicks |
| Labour move further right on 16:27 - Mar 2 by lowhouseblue |
across all voters the top 3 issues are tackling the costs of living crisis, improving the nhs, and reducing immigration. you can pretend this isn't true of course, but if labour is to win again it needs to appeal to a good proportion of the 2/3rds of voters who see immigration as a priority issue. it needs to deliver of all 3 of the above. there's a group of far left voters who supported labour because of corbyn and now support the greens who it is impossible to ever see being part of an election winning alliance - many of the policies they support, including open borders however they might finesse that and leaving nato etc, are toxic to most of the rest of the electorate. again, you can pretend otherwise if you want. |
So they favour the UK instigating open borders unilaterally.
Your knowledge of why people vote for what is remarkable.
Unless you're making it up again..... |  | | |
| Labour move further right on 18:23 - Mar 2 with 1087 views | reusersfreekicks |
| Labour move further right on 16:37 - Mar 2 by J2BLUE |
Agree. Starmer has as little chance of getting the far left to vote for him as he does the far right.
As usual, people forget it's not a black and white issue. There are lots of people all along the political spectrum and Labour only need enough of those hovering around the middle third to win. |
The far left
arf | | | |
| Labour move further right on 18:32 - Mar 2 with 1062 views | eireblue |
| Labour move further right on 18:17 - Mar 2 by J2BLUE |
Do people support it to reduce crime? It seems to me they support it because they want revenge and to avoid paying to keep that person for the rest of their life.
I doubt they would support it as strongly once they find out you can sit on death row for decades and the legal appeals cost a fortune. |
I am not making a point about the death penalty.
I am making a point about policy and easy populist policy making.
Politics is about delivering real outcomes to real people.
Winning votes based on aligning to popular opinion isn’t leadership.
As the OP points out, Labour are following Reform, Lowhouse is saying that is correct.
I think anyone looking at the Tories could see where that strategy may lead.
And yes, sorry to address your point, people re-act emotionally to incidents. So yes support for the death penalty will go up after a particularly heinous crime. So there is some evidence people do re-act emotionally to events. I think same can also be said of other areas of policy. Politics is meant to rise above that, not stoke it. [Post edited 2 Mar 18:35]
| | | |
| Labour move further right on 18:38 - Mar 2 with 1037 views | Dubtractor |
| Labour move further right on 18:32 - Mar 2 by eireblue |
I am not making a point about the death penalty.
I am making a point about policy and easy populist policy making.
Politics is about delivering real outcomes to real people.
Winning votes based on aligning to popular opinion isn’t leadership.
As the OP points out, Labour are following Reform, Lowhouse is saying that is correct.
I think anyone looking at the Tories could see where that strategy may lead.
And yes, sorry to address your point, people re-act emotionally to incidents. So yes support for the death penalty will go up after a particularly heinous crime. So there is some evidence people do re-act emotionally to events. I think same can also be said of other areas of policy. Politics is meant to rise above that, not stoke it. [Post edited 2 Mar 18:35]
|
Agree with all of this, including the edit addition.
Also, people can talk about Labour needing to appeal to certain demographics on immigration, but trying to do so has been, and I suspect will continue to be, disastrous for their polling. In simple terms they are trying to woo voters who simply won't vote for them, and in doing so are losing the very people who DID vote for them. [Post edited 2 Mar 18:42]
|  |
| |
| Labour move further right on 21:06 - Mar 2 with 859 views | DJR |
You don't have to be far left to object to the proposals in the OP. Even the Law Society has misgivings.
https://www.theguardian.com/wo
"Mahmood’s move to make asylum temporary ‘may undermine refugee convention’
Law Society says home secretary’s review of refugee status after 30 months is in tension with UK’s legal obligations"
They've been able to implement this without primary legislation but primary legislation will follow to increase to 20 years the period before an accepted refugee can gain settled status, and take away the right for their children to join them, something Alf Dubs, a child refugee is concerned about.
https://www.theguardian.com/po
"Shabana Mahmood’s double down on immigration ‘disappointing’, says Alf Dubs
Labour peer, who was a child refugee, criticises home secretary’s response to Gorton and Denton byelection defeat"
No wonder many natural Labour supporters have misgivings about things such as this but none of this will be enough for Reform or even many Tory voters, given the more extreme rhetoric coming out of both. Indeed, Labour aren't proposing to mirror the other parties and leave the ECHR, something that opens up the prospect of mass deportations of people legally here and something that has crept on to the political agenda in recent months.
Of course it may well be that the Tories and Reform will enter into some sort of pact before the next election in which case we are doomed but if not, Labour could well have won the next election if it only held on to the 34% that voted for it, rather than alienating a lot of its support by going after people who just won't vote for it. [Post edited 2 Mar 21:43]
|  | | |
| Labour move further right on 21:11 - Mar 2 with 847 views | DJR |
| Labour move further right on 18:38 - Mar 2 by Dubtractor |
Agree with all of this, including the edit addition.
Also, people can talk about Labour needing to appeal to certain demographics on immigration, but trying to do so has been, and I suspect will continue to be, disastrous for their polling. In simple terms they are trying to woo voters who simply won't vote for them, and in doing so are losing the very people who DID vote for them. [Post edited 2 Mar 18:42]
|
This is a good analysis of where Labour are going wrong, and it surely can't be argued in a place like Gorton and Denton that the 15,000 people who voted Green are far left?
https://www.theguardian.com/po
Green win shows progressive voters are now voting against Labour as well as Reform
Ben Ansell
Gorton and Denton byelection shatters Labour strategy of neglecting its core base while focusing on Reform defectors
Until very recently, No 10 strategy, as defined by Morgan McSweeney, was built around neglecting, even insulting, progressive voters, and seeking to win back defections to Reform. Come the next general election, so the argument went, progressives would sheepishly have to back Labour, just as leftwing voters in France got behind Emmanuel Macron when push came to shove.
This strategy relied on setting Reform UK up as a bogeyman and hoping to assemble a “republican front” of voters on the centre and left against it come election day. If voters on the left inevitably came home, then Labour could concentrate instead on “hero voters”: older, more socially conservative residents of “red wall” constituencies in the north of England and the Midlands. Hence, months of posturing against progressive causes and an immigration policy more draconian than anything the past Conservative government had put forward.
That plan has been shattered by the voters of Gorton and Denton. They chose not to get behind Labour when faced with the hardline populism of Matthew Goodwin, the Reform candidate. They backed the Greens instead. Even worse, Reform did at least show they could unify the right – albeit in a constituency where the Conservatives had performed poorly in 2024. Labour ended up with a split left in which it was the smaller party. Just as in the Caerphilly Senedd byelection last year, it had lost its progressive vote to a rival on its left.
McSweeney was half right in the end. Reform’s illiberalism does inspire people to get out and vote against it. As Reform collects an ever more unwieldy set of dubious electoral propositions – banning permanent residence for immigrants, removing renters’ rights, ending the “unregulated sexual economy” – it resembles the game Buckaroo. Each extra bizarre policy makes the electoral donkey ever more likely to kick it off. Yes, Reform could win the 2029 general election, but it seems equally likely that the public will align against it.
But align with whom? The obvious answer to that question should be Britain’s largest progressive party. But the apparent holder of that role, Labour, has been reluctant to accept it. Rather than make peace with an urban voting base of younger graduates in professional jobs, poorer service sector workers and minority ethnic communities, Labour seems to have been pining for the demographic that voted for it in the 1970s – older, manual workers in small towns. But that group was, for good or ill, lost to Labour decades ago. Worse, Labour has tried to win them back by rhetorically giving its new voters a good kicking.
Nostalgia-fuelled electoral strategies don’t work. And the Greens have been much more aggressively effective at finding a new voter base. Far from their old base of environmentalists and nimbies, they have decided to claim Labour’s as their own. And they have been able to do so not just because they have found charismatic leadership in Zack Polanski, and with Gorton and Denton’s winner, Hannah Spencer; they have also succeeded because Labour upset the general public and its own voters to such an extent that a huge political gap opened up for the Greens to walk into.
Labour’s basic electoral problem comes from the fact that left-leaning voters are choosing to vote against rather than for parties. And progressives aren’t just voting against Reform, they are now actively voting against Labour. [Post edited 2 Mar 21:22]
| | | |
| Labour move further right on 22:28 - Mar 2 with 744 views | BanksterDebtSlave |
Fortunately she'll be toast after the next election. |  |
| |
| Labour move further right on 23:38 - Mar 2 with 688 views | reusersfreekicks |
| Labour move further right on 21:11 - Mar 2 by DJR |
This is a good analysis of where Labour are going wrong, and it surely can't be argued in a place like Gorton and Denton that the 15,000 people who voted Green are far left?
https://www.theguardian.com/po
Green win shows progressive voters are now voting against Labour as well as Reform
Ben Ansell
Gorton and Denton byelection shatters Labour strategy of neglecting its core base while focusing on Reform defectors
Until very recently, No 10 strategy, as defined by Morgan McSweeney, was built around neglecting, even insulting, progressive voters, and seeking to win back defections to Reform. Come the next general election, so the argument went, progressives would sheepishly have to back Labour, just as leftwing voters in France got behind Emmanuel Macron when push came to shove.
This strategy relied on setting Reform UK up as a bogeyman and hoping to assemble a “republican front” of voters on the centre and left against it come election day. If voters on the left inevitably came home, then Labour could concentrate instead on “hero voters”: older, more socially conservative residents of “red wall” constituencies in the north of England and the Midlands. Hence, months of posturing against progressive causes and an immigration policy more draconian than anything the past Conservative government had put forward.
That plan has been shattered by the voters of Gorton and Denton. They chose not to get behind Labour when faced with the hardline populism of Matthew Goodwin, the Reform candidate. They backed the Greens instead. Even worse, Reform did at least show they could unify the right – albeit in a constituency where the Conservatives had performed poorly in 2024. Labour ended up with a split left in which it was the smaller party. Just as in the Caerphilly Senedd byelection last year, it had lost its progressive vote to a rival on its left.
McSweeney was half right in the end. Reform’s illiberalism does inspire people to get out and vote against it. As Reform collects an ever more unwieldy set of dubious electoral propositions – banning permanent residence for immigrants, removing renters’ rights, ending the “unregulated sexual economy” – it resembles the game Buckaroo. Each extra bizarre policy makes the electoral donkey ever more likely to kick it off. Yes, Reform could win the 2029 general election, but it seems equally likely that the public will align against it.
But align with whom? The obvious answer to that question should be Britain’s largest progressive party. But the apparent holder of that role, Labour, has been reluctant to accept it. Rather than make peace with an urban voting base of younger graduates in professional jobs, poorer service sector workers and minority ethnic communities, Labour seems to have been pining for the demographic that voted for it in the 1970s – older, manual workers in small towns. But that group was, for good or ill, lost to Labour decades ago. Worse, Labour has tried to win them back by rhetorically giving its new voters a good kicking.
Nostalgia-fuelled electoral strategies don’t work. And the Greens have been much more aggressively effective at finding a new voter base. Far from their old base of environmentalists and nimbies, they have decided to claim Labour’s as their own. And they have been able to do so not just because they have found charismatic leadership in Zack Polanski, and with Gorton and Denton’s winner, Hannah Spencer; they have also succeeded because Labour upset the general public and its own voters to such an extent that a huge political gap opened up for the Greens to walk into.
Labour’s basic electoral problem comes from the fact that left-leaning voters are choosing to vote against rather than for parties. And progressives aren’t just voting against Reform, they are now actively voting against Labour. [Post edited 2 Mar 21:22]
|
Crazy isn't it - trying to appeal to people who will never return to vote for them and pi55ing off people who have been voting for them.
Morals and ethics seem to have no place on the Labour front bench [Post edited 2 Mar 23:48]
| | | |
| Labour move further right on 07:50 - Mar 3 with 520 views | Dubtractor |
| Labour move further right on 18:38 - Mar 2 by Dubtractor |
Agree with all of this, including the edit addition.
Also, people can talk about Labour needing to appeal to certain demographics on immigration, but trying to do so has been, and I suspect will continue to be, disastrous for their polling. In simple terms they are trying to woo voters who simply won't vote for them, and in doing so are losing the very people who DID vote for them. [Post edited 2 Mar 18:42]
|
Labour chasing the reform vote update.
Greens now in second place ahead of Labour for the first time in a new YouGov poll, and just two points behind Reform.
Lowest ever rating for Keir Starmer's party
REF: 23% (-1)
GRN 21% (+4)
LAB 16%(-2)
CON 16%(-2)
LDEM 14%(nc) — Adam Bienkov (@adambienkov.bsky.social) 2026-03-03T07:17:35.060Z
[Post edited 3 Mar 7:58]
| |
| |
| Labour move further right on 10:55 - Mar 3 with 376 views | GlasgowBlue |
| Labour move further right on 07:50 - Mar 3 by Dubtractor |
Labour chasing the reform vote update.
Greens now in second place ahead of Labour for the first time in a new YouGov poll, and just two points behind Reform.
Lowest ever rating for Keir Starmer's party
REF: 23% (-1)
GRN 21% (+4)
LAB 16%(-2)
CON 16%(-2)
LDEM 14%(nc) — Adam Bienkov (@adambienkov.bsky.social) 2026-03-03T07:17:35.060Z
[Post edited 3 Mar 7:58]
|
It's an odd coalition of traditional conservative (with a small c) environmentalists and the Corbyn/Galloway middle east obsessives in the Greens and I can see it it unraveling before the next election. As a socially liberal vegetarian with concerns about the environment I should fall into their demographic. But not whilst they have 7/10 and Iran apologists like Mothin Ali in the party.
There was a discussion on here the other day about how the press will have a hard time attacking the Greens over antisemitism the way they were able to attack Labour under Corbyn. They aren't helping themselves with appointments like this.
https://www.jewishnews.co.uk/g |  |
| |
| Labour move further right on 11:27 - Mar 3 with 316 views | positivity |
| Labour move further right on 07:50 - Mar 3 by Dubtractor |
Labour chasing the reform vote update.
Greens now in second place ahead of Labour for the first time in a new YouGov poll, and just two points behind Reform.
Lowest ever rating for Keir Starmer's party
REF: 23% (-1)
GRN 21% (+4)
LAB 16%(-2)
CON 16%(-2)
LDEM 14%(nc) — Adam Bienkov (@adambienkov.bsky.social) 2026-03-03T07:17:35.060Z
[Post edited 3 Mar 7:58]
|
appreciate it's only one poll, so a massive margin of error, but interesting that the right wing parties are getting less than 40% combined (similar to their performance in the election).
labour losing far more voters to the left than the right | |
| |
| Labour move further right on 11:30 - Mar 3 with 301 views | GlasgowBlue |
| Labour move further right on 11:27 - Mar 3 by positivity |
appreciate it's only one poll, so a massive margin of error, but interesting that the right wing parties are getting less than 40% combined (similar to their performance in the election).
labour losing far more voters to the left than the right |
According to some Labour are now a right wing party, so I make that 55%  | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
