| Cash to Splash 11:39 - Jul 26 with 1617 views | Wickets |
Anyone know how much we have to strengthen before we get into trouble? |  | | |  |
| Cash to Splash on 11:41 - Jul 26 with 1596 views | hsg78 |
Bucketloads |  | | |
| Cash to Splash on 11:52 - Jul 26 with 1523 views | Axeldalai_lama |
£75,358,739.13p |  | | |
| Cash to Splash on 14:04 - Jul 26 with 1166 views | MK1 |
Think we are ok for this coming season as we came straight back up. I don't know for sure, but we probably could get 5 or 6 quality players for around £20M (each) and be within our limits. |  |
| |
| Cash to Splash on 14:35 - Jul 26 with 1095 views | jayessess |
Someone better at maths than me reckoned maybe £100m headroom on the basis of our published accounts. That'd be split between wages and year one of fee amortisation. For context 10-15 players might cost you £30-50m in wages and £50m would potentially stretch very far in terms of headline fees (which divide by contract length for accounting purposes). |  |
| |
| Cash to Splash on 14:44 - Jul 26 with 1038 views | Bobbychase |
| Cash to Splash on 14:35 - Jul 26 by jayessess |
Someone better at maths than me reckoned maybe £100m headroom on the basis of our published accounts. That'd be split between wages and year one of fee amortisation. For context 10-15 players might cost you £30-50m in wages and £50m would potentially stretch very far in terms of headline fees (which divide by contract length for accounting purposes). |
I suppose we have to factor in a fee for Philogene. And others. Or does that form part of another set of figures? |  |
| |
| Cash to Splash on 14:48 - Jul 26 with 1012 views | jayessess |
| Cash to Splash on 14:44 - Jul 26 by Bobbychase |
I suppose we have to factor in a fee for Philogene. And others. Or does that form part of another set of figures? |
Philogene would be more on top (though we'd have to pay off the rest of his fee in this year's books, so any additional headroom would be less that £13m or so). | |
| |
| Cash to Splash on 14:52 - Jul 26 with 962 views | SuffolkPunchFC |
SCR will not be what limits our spending.
https://www.twtd.co.uk/forum/6
It will be more about prudence - we can’t risk too much in case we get relegated. We do have a lot of flexibility though, as our squad cost : revenue ratio has been keep low.
I would not be surprised if we spend an additional £70-120M | | | |
| Cash to Splash on 16:08 - Jul 26 with 761 views | Wickets |
| Cash to Splash on 14:52 - Jul 26 by SuffolkPunchFC |
SCR will not be what limits our spending.
https://www.twtd.co.uk/forum/6
It will be more about prudence - we can’t risk too much in case we get relegated. We do have a lot of flexibility though, as our squad cost : revenue ratio has been keep low.
I would not be surprised if we spend an additional £70-120M |
Thanks this is quite easy to understand and more les what I was hoping for. | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Cash to Splash on 16:23 - Jul 26 with 661 views | OldFart71 |
We also have to consider whoever we bring in now we will most likely require a couple of new additions in the January window and I would imagine that not all the players coming in now will be bought.
It is difficult to know how many come in as we don't know how many will depart, There has been speculation mainly surrounding Philogen and also mentioned that it may be possible Hirst goes. along with Taylor and McAteer.
Then of course you have Players like Al Hamadi,Szmodics and Humphries. Szmodics being the most likely to command the highest fee. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
