| SQUAD NUMBERS ARE HERE on 16:03 - Aug 19 with 2657 views | FoghornGleghorn |
Guess that's George confirmed gone then  |  | |  |
| SQUAD NUMBERS ARE HERE on 16:04 - Aug 19 with 2617 views | Metal_Hacker |
| SQUAD NUMBERS ARE HERE on 16:03 - Aug 19 by FoghornGleghorn |
Guess that's George confirmed gone then |
And a new one coming in ... No9 |  |
| |
| SQUAD NUMBERS ARE HERE on 16:04 - Aug 19 with 2584 views | Zx1988 |
Interesting to see that Hirst hasn't been given a squad number yet, given today's additional information on the Stoke situation, Johnson has been given 18. | |
| Not a prophet, or a stone-age man; just a mortal with potential of a superman. | | Poll: | Worst Ginger? |
| |
| SQUAD NUMBERS ARE HERE on 16:06 - Aug 19 with 2528 views | Perublue |
| SQUAD NUMBERS ARE HERE on 16:04 - Aug 19 by Metal_Hacker |
And a new one coming in ... No9 |
Ed Sheeran |  |
| |
| SQUAD NUMBERS ARE HERE on 16:06 - Aug 19 with 2517 views | SitfcB |
| SQUAD NUMBERS ARE HERE on 16:04 - Aug 19 by Metal_Hacker |
And a new one coming in ... No9 |
‘The number 9 shirt has been retired in honour of departing Town legend George Hirst’ |  |
| |
| SQUAD NUMBERS ARE HERE on 16:07 - Aug 19 with 2465 views | Metal_Hacker |
| SQUAD NUMBERS ARE HERE on 16:06 - Aug 19 by SitfcB |
‘The number 9 shirt has been retired in honour of departing Town legend George Hirst’ |
Obvs ! | |
| |
| SQUAD NUMBERS ARE HERE on 16:08 - Aug 19 with 2421 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
| SQUAD NUMBERS ARE HERE on 16:04 - Aug 19 by Zx1988 |
Interesting to see that Hirst hasn't been given a squad number yet, given today's additional information on the Stoke situation, Johnson has been given 18. |
Hirst is a permanent exit. We're likely to have a January recall on Johnson. [Post edited 19 Aug 16:09]
|  |
| |
| SQUAD NUMBERS ARE HERE on 16:09 - Aug 19 with 2376 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
| SQUAD NUMBERS ARE HERE on 16:03 - Aug 19 by FoghornGleghorn |
Guess that's George confirmed gone then |
And AAH it would seem. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| SQUAD NUMBERS ARE HERE on 16:15 - Aug 19 with 2220 views | gainsboroughblue |
4 incomings at least then?
9 free
15, 16, 17 are fairly prominent numbers to have blank as well. |  |
| |
| SQUAD NUMBERS ARE HERE on 16:19 - Aug 19 with 2120 views | Vic |
4 keepers? |  |
| |
| SQUAD NUMBERS ARE HERE on 16:20 - Aug 19 with 2088 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
| SQUAD NUMBERS ARE HERE on 16:15 - Aug 19 by gainsboroughblue |
4 incomings at least then?
9 free
15, 16, 17 are fairly prominent numbers to have blank as well. |
4 at the most I would imagine. But my money is still on 2 more.
Palacios (Loan)
Striker (Probable Loan)
2 more in January. | |
| |
| SQUAD NUMBERS ARE HERE on 16:22 - Aug 19 with 2048 views | IpswichBlue18 |
| SQUAD NUMBERS ARE HERE on 16:15 - Aug 19 by gainsboroughblue |
4 incomings at least then?
9 free
15, 16, 17 are fairly prominent numbers to have blank as well. |
17 has been left free for years because of Ed Sheeran? |  | | |
| SQUAD NUMBERS ARE HERE on 16:25 - Aug 19 with 1985 views | burnbudgiesburn |
Looks like Button may be given a contract to be no.3 then
Third keeper is a waste of a squad place, but I guess with 2 under 21's we can afford it. | | | |
| SQUAD NUMBERS ARE HERE on 16:25 - Aug 19 with 1979 views | Zx1988 |
Have the two Dutch 'keepers always worn non-1 numbers at their previous clubs? | |
| Not a prophet, or a stone-age man; just a mortal with potential of a superman. | | Poll: | Worst Ginger? |
| |
| SQUAD NUMBERS ARE HERE on 16:33 - Aug 19 with 1853 views | BloomBlue |
| SQUAD NUMBERS ARE HERE on 16:09 - Aug 19 by Cheltenham_Blue |
And AAH it would seem. |
Must be leaving on a permanent, if he was going out on loan I assume he would have a number assigned. |  | | |
| SQUAD NUMBERS ARE HERE on 16:50 - Aug 19 with 1717 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
| SQUAD NUMBERS ARE HERE on 16:33 - Aug 19 by BloomBlue |
Must be leaving on a permanent, if he was going out on loan I assume he would have a number assigned. |
Assume so. Unless there is a mutual termination coming. [Post edited 19 Aug 16:53]
| |
| |
| SQUAD NUMBERS ARE HERE on 16:58 - Aug 19 with 1633 views | _CliveBaker_ |
Do I not like that.
Palmer #1 and Kipre #4 stinks.
Scherpen #37 and Maeda #38 is horrible as well, presumably they asked for them as they're old club numbers but I would've outright refused. Horrible.
O'Shea needs to grow up as well. |  | | |
| SQUAD NUMBERS ARE HERE on 17:02 - Aug 19 with 1591 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
| SQUAD NUMBERS ARE HERE on 16:58 - Aug 19 by _CliveBaker_ |
Do I not like that.
Palmer #1 and Kipre #4 stinks.
Scherpen #37 and Maeda #38 is horrible as well, presumably they asked for them as they're old club numbers but I would've outright refused. Horrible.
O'Shea needs to grow up as well. |
Wait until you notice that Princess Ademiluyi from the Women's team prefers a squad number of 99 | |
| |
| SQUAD NUMBERS ARE HERE on 17:03 - Aug 19 with 1583 views | Zx1988 |
| SQUAD NUMBERS ARE HERE on 16:58 - Aug 19 by _CliveBaker_ |
Do I not like that.
Palmer #1 and Kipre #4 stinks.
Scherpen #37 and Maeda #38 is horrible as well, presumably they asked for them as they're old club numbers but I would've outright refused. Horrible.
O'Shea needs to grow up as well. |
I'm sort of with you there.
If I was GO'N I'd assign squad numbers sequentially in the first instance, so Scherpen would be #1, O'Shea #5, Diop #6 etc.,
If players then have a preferred shirt number (like #47 for Clarke) they can have it, but the vacated number doesn't get back-filled.
It just seems stupid to have Palmer as #1, when it seems as if the received wisdom is that he's likely to be third choice if he even stays. | |
| Not a prophet, or a stone-age man; just a mortal with potential of a superman. | | Poll: | Worst Ginger? |
| |
| SQUAD NUMBERS ARE HERE on 17:03 - Aug 19 with 1576 views | _CliveBaker_ |
| SQUAD NUMBERS ARE HERE on 17:02 - Aug 19 by Cheltenham_Blue |
Wait until you notice that Princess Ademiluyi from the Women's team prefers a squad number of 99 |
Tear up her contract I say. | | | |
| SQUAD NUMBERS ARE HERE on 17:06 - Aug 19 with 1549 views | Vaughan8 |
| SQUAD NUMBERS ARE HERE on 17:03 - Aug 19 by Zx1988 |
I'm sort of with you there.
If I was GO'N I'd assign squad numbers sequentially in the first instance, so Scherpen would be #1, O'Shea #5, Diop #6 etc.,
If players then have a preferred shirt number (like #47 for Clarke) they can have it, but the vacated number doesn't get back-filled.
It just seems stupid to have Palmer as #1, when it seems as if the received wisdom is that he's likely to be third choice if he even stays. |
Scherpen was 37 at USG I think so that's probably he "preferred" number.
Squad numbers mean nothing really. | | | |
| SQUAD NUMBERS ARE HERE on 17:06 - Aug 19 with 1544 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
| SQUAD NUMBERS ARE HERE on 16:58 - Aug 19 by _CliveBaker_ |
Do I not like that.
Palmer #1 and Kipre #4 stinks.
Scherpen #37 and Maeda #38 is horrible as well, presumably they asked for them as they're old club numbers but I would've outright refused. Horrible.
O'Shea needs to grow up as well. |
Maeda's preference for 38 goes all the way back to his first professional appearances for Matsumoto Yamaga in 2015.
Sherpen was 37 at Union Saint-Gilloise | |
| |
| SQUAD NUMBERS ARE HERE on 17:07 - Aug 19 with 1528 views | _CliveBaker_ |
| SQUAD NUMBERS ARE HERE on 17:03 - Aug 19 by Zx1988 |
I'm sort of with you there.
If I was GO'N I'd assign squad numbers sequentially in the first instance, so Scherpen would be #1, O'Shea #5, Diop #6 etc.,
If players then have a preferred shirt number (like #47 for Clarke) they can have it, but the vacated number doesn't get back-filled.
It just seems stupid to have Palmer as #1, when it seems as if the received wisdom is that he's likely to be third choice if he even stays. |
Guess Scherpen and Maeda are preferred numbers as Maeda wore 38 for Celtic and pretty sure Scherpen was 37 in Belgium.
I'd refuse. I can't stand a keeper not wearing #1. | | | |
| SQUAD NUMBERS ARE HERE on 17:14 - Aug 19 with 1470 views | greyhound |
25 free... I wonder who we are after who might currently wear that number. | | | |
| SQUAD NUMBERS ARE HERE on 17:19 - Aug 19 with 1438 views | _CliveBaker_ |
| SQUAD NUMBERS ARE HERE on 17:14 - Aug 19 by greyhound |
25 free... I wonder who we are after who might currently wear that number. |
I had the same thought... | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
