| Striker, or 2 14:08 - Aug 26 with 1504 views | Keno |
does anyone know where are with bringing a stiker or 2 |  |
| |  |
| Striker, or 2 on 14:17 - Aug 26 with 1394 views | Kropotkin123 |
Probably 2. Doubt GON trusts Akpom... [Post edited 26 Aug 14:18]
|  |
| |
| Striker, or 2 on 14:19 - Aug 26 with 1362 views | bartyg |
| Striker, or 2 on 14:17 - Aug 26 by Kropotkin123 |
Probably 2. Doubt GON trusts Akpom... [Post edited 26 Aug 14:18]
|
He's yet to earn it, I heard |  |
| |
| Striker, or 2 on 14:22 - Aug 26 with 1293 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
A Striker or two. |  |
| |
| Striker, or 2 on 14:23 - Aug 26 with 1292 views | Canuck_Blue |
| Striker, or 2 on 14:17 - Aug 26 by Kropotkin123 |
Probably 2. Doubt GON trusts Akpom... [Post edited 26 Aug 14:18]
|
Except he expressly stated the opposite…
https://www.twtd.co.uk/ipswich
Based on that, I would say he will stay as #3 behind Emersonn and whoever gets brought in in the next week. |  | | |
| Striker, or 2 on 14:37 - Aug 26 with 1160 views | SamWhiteUK |
| Striker, or 2 on 14:23 - Aug 26 by Canuck_Blue |
Except he expressly stated the opposite…
https://www.twtd.co.uk/ipswich
Based on that, I would say he will stay as #3 behind Emersonn and whoever gets brought in in the next week. |
 |  | | |
| Striker, or 2 on 14:49 - Aug 26 with 1054 views | Kropotkin123 |
| Striker, or 2 on 14:23 - Aug 26 by Canuck_Blue |
Except he expressly stated the opposite…
https://www.twtd.co.uk/ipswich
Based on that, I would say he will stay as #3 behind Emersonn and whoever gets brought in in the next week. |
Hello punchline, nice to meet you! | |
| |
| Striker, or 2 on 16:11 - Aug 26 with 797 views | tetchris |
Get rid of Hirst but retain Akpom. Doesn’t make sense. Akpom has done nothing since he signed. I know Hirst isn’t exactly prolific but think we would do a better job in PL than Akpom. | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Striker, or 2 on 16:38 - Aug 26 with 689 views | cbower |
| Striker, or 2 on 16:11 - Aug 26 by tetchris |
Get rid of Hirst but retain Akpom. Doesn’t make sense. Akpom has done nothing since he signed. I know Hirst isn’t exactly prolific but think we would do a better job in PL than Akpom. |
Surely you must see why it was Hirst that went?
Akpom was so poor last season that his attractiveness to other clubs was not very strong. On promotion,we were obliged to buy at the agreed price of a reported ÂŁ7 million. His wage, already at Championship level a tidy sum no doubt, will have switched to that originally agreed upon promotion making him almost unsellable to anyone below the Premier League. He was virtually impossible to shift.
Hirst meanwhile, despite being on a decent wedge that will have increased on promotion too, I doubt was on anything like Akpom. Add into this that he had just scored 10+ Championship goals and that a decent fee for him would be profit on the books, of the two it was George who was possible and most profitable to move on. Shame really as he had looked decent on his appearances against Premier League opposition in 2024/5.
I'm sure you knew all this already, didn't you? |  |
| |
| Striker, or 2 on 16:38 - Aug 26 with 688 views | Metal_Hacker |
| Striker, or 2 on 16:11 - Aug 26 by tetchris |
Get rid of Hirst but retain Akpom. Doesn’t make sense. Akpom has done nothing since he signed. I know Hirst isn’t exactly prolific but think we would do a better job in PL than Akpom. |
It makes sense from a financial point of view |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
