| Villa paying £65M for Jackson? 21:43 - Aug 26 with 2072 views | MK1 |
How the hell is he worth £65M? If we want a decent CF, he is going to cost serious ££££££'s.
Aston Villa are close to an agreement to sign striker Nicolas Jackson from Chelsea in a deal worth up to £65m. (From the BBC) |  |
| |  |
| Villa paying £65M for Jackson? on 21:45 - Aug 26 with 2023 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
Chelsea doing some unbelievable business this summer. I've no idea how they are getting fees like they are. |  |
| |
| Villa paying £65M for Jackson? on 21:53 - Aug 26 with 1893 views | ParisBlue |
But much for Kayden |  |
| |
| Villa paying £65M for Jackson? on 21:55 - Aug 26 with 1875 views | JakeITFC |
| Villa paying £65M for Jackson? on 21:45 - Aug 26 by Cheltenham_Blue |
Chelsea doing some unbelievable business this summer. I've no idea how they are getting fees like they are. |
In the case of them and Villa, via close to fraudulent means I would suggest. |  | | |
| Villa paying £65M for Jackson? on 21:59 - Aug 26 with 1801 views | pingu67 |
In reality he's only 2 years older than delap but has a far superior scoring record
65 mil seems about right if delap is worth 50 |  | | |
| Villa paying £65M for Jackson? on 22:00 - Aug 26 with 1779 views | FrimleyBlue |
Villa got to give back some of that rogers money |  |
| |
| Villa paying £65M for Jackson? on 22:03 - Aug 26 with 1747 views | MK1 |
| Villa paying £65M for Jackson? on 21:59 - Aug 26 by pingu67 |
In reality he's only 2 years older than delap but has a far superior scoring record
65 mil seems about right if delap is worth 50 |
Oh, I agree. £50M for Delap is crazy money. I thought they would have to take a loss on him. Jackson is worth £40M max. | |
| |
| Villa paying £65M for Jackson? on 22:10 - Aug 26 with 1672 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
| Villa paying £65M for Jackson? on 22:03 - Aug 26 by MK1 |
Oh, I agree. £50M for Delap is crazy money. I thought they would have to take a loss on him. Jackson is worth £40M max. |
There is no way in this world or the next that Delap has done anything over the last year to warrant a £20m profit.
That being said, we're reputedly valuing Mehmeti at £9m | |
| |
| Villa paying £65M for Jackson? on 07:30 - Aug 27 with 1086 views | MattinLondon |
| Villa paying £65M for Jackson? on 22:10 - Aug 26 by Cheltenham_Blue |
There is no way in this world or the next that Delap has done anything over the last year to warrant a £20m profit.
That being said, we're reputedly valuing Mehmeti at £9m |
I think anyone who mentions the £20M profit that Chelsea might well make on Delap are looking at it wrongly.
Due to the relegation release clause in his contract, the fee Chelsea paid us for Liam Delap was artificially cheap. No clause, and he would’ve gone for £50M minimum.
The fee Forest are reported to have agreed with Chelsea, through a tad excessive is still almost bang on the money in today’s market. [Post edited 27 Aug 7:31]
|  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Villa paying £65M for Jackson? on 07:38 - Aug 27 with 1041 views | greyhound |
The difference is Jackson is a decent proven goal scorer. I think it's about right. | | | |
| Villa paying £65M for Jackson? on 07:40 - Aug 27 with 1034 views | ReusersTown |
| Villa paying £65M for Jackson? on 22:10 - Aug 26 by Cheltenham_Blue |
There is no way in this world or the next that Delap has done anything over the last year to warrant a £20m profit.
That being said, we're reputedly valuing Mehmeti at £9m |
What they paid at the time was a low buyout clause though, we all know we got shafted on Delap. So it's not necessarily that he's gone up by £20m. We did just pay £24m for a basically unproven Emersonn. | | | |
| Villa paying £65M for Jackson? on 07:46 - Aug 27 with 999 views | DarkBrandon |
| Villa paying £65M for Jackson? on 07:38 - Aug 27 by greyhound |
The difference is Jackson is a decent proven goal scorer. I think it's about right. |
Delap got 12 goals in a side which was at the wrong end of the table all season.
He’s a proven goal scorer at this level, although Chelsea have done their best to drill that out of him. |  | | |
| Villa paying £65M for Jackson? on 08:05 - Aug 27 with 925 views | greyhound |
| Villa paying £65M for Jackson? on 07:46 - Aug 27 by DarkBrandon |
Delap got 12 goals in a side which was at the wrong end of the table all season.
He’s a proven goal scorer at this level, although Chelsea have done their best to drill that out of him. |
It's what they do | | | |
| Villa paying £65M for Jackson? on 08:07 - Aug 27 with 919 views | Tonytown |
| Villa paying £65M for Jackson? on 22:10 - Aug 26 by Cheltenham_Blue |
There is no way in this world or the next that Delap has done anything over the last year to warrant a £20m profit.
That being said, we're reputedly valuing Mehmeti at £9m |
We got Mehmeti cheaply as he was in the last few months of his contract.
£9m is a fair price I would say | | | |
| Villa paying £65M for Jackson? on 08:27 - Aug 27 with 853 views | Gary_Knows |
Also now makes the Morgan Rogers deal to Chelsea look ‘cheap’ at £52m.
Nothing to see here though, nothing to see at all… |  |
| |
| Villa paying £65M for Jackson? on 09:01 - Aug 27 with 737 views | WolfieAtTheBack |
They will only ever be one Jackson.
K Jackson. [Post edited 27 Aug 9:01]
|  | | |
| Villa paying £65M for Jackson? on 09:13 - Aug 27 with 664 views | Swansea_Blue |
Ow! Shamone |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
