Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
So if Maguire had caught the ball thrown it at Greaves and it had gone in 19:11 - Aug 30 with 960 viewsRoburmsyenna

would it have been allowed?

Poll: Would you re-sign Sam Morsy in the January window??

1
So if Maguire had caught the ball thrown it at Greaves and it had gone in on 19:13 - Aug 30 with 939 viewsbelgablue

There's clearly a lot of hypertheticals on this. And they're all total chuff.

Poll: Which nickname for ITFC do you prefer?

0
So if Maguire had caught the ball thrown it at Greaves and it had gone in on 19:14 - Aug 30 with 882 viewsBasingstokeBlue

He wouldn't have needed to cheat that much.

Poll: What do you think of the three stars being relocated?

0
So if Maguire had caught the ball thrown it at Greaves and it had gone in on 19:15 - Aug 30 with 877 viewspointofblue

No because that would be deemed deliberate. VAR decided the handball was accidental, which is partly why the goal stood.

Poll: Who would you play at right centre back on Saturday?

-1
So if Maguire had caught the ball thrown it at Greaves and it had gone in on 19:15 - Aug 30 with 877 viewsernie

That would have been deliberate; they ruled that Maguire’s handball was not deliberate, which was obviously bullshit.
2
So if Maguire had caught the ball thrown it at Greaves and it had gone in on 19:15 - Aug 30 with 877 viewsPlums

No, because in that situation, the referee would have blown for handball.

It's 106 miles to Portman Road, we've got a full tank of gas, half a round of Port Salut, it's dark... and we're wearing blue tinted sunglasses.
Poll: Which recent triallist should we have signed?

-1
So if Maguire had caught the ball thrown it at Greaves and it had gone in on 19:15 - Aug 30 with 870 views_CliveBaker_

No because that would be a deliberate handball.

Shit rule though. If it’s a handball it’s a handball. Either give us the free kick because he’s handled it, or don’t if they want to look at intent. Either way the whole ‘if he scores it’s not a goal, if it’s an OG it is’ is utterly ridiculous.
3
So if Maguire had caught the ball thrown it at Greaves and it had gone in on 19:17 - Aug 30 with 844 viewsSwansea_Blue

So if Maguire had caught the ball thrown it at Greaves and it had gone in on 19:15 - Aug 30 by pointofblue

No because that would be deemed deliberate. VAR decided the handball was accidental, which is partly why the goal stood.


Do we know that for sure, because that’s not how it was reported at the time?

Poll: Escaped Goat of the day. Who’s it going to be?

0
So if Maguire had caught the ball thrown it at Greaves and it had gone in on 19:20 - Aug 30 with 806 viewsBasingstokeBlue

So if Maguire had caught the ball thrown it at Greaves and it had gone in on 19:15 - Aug 30 by _CliveBaker_

No because that would be a deliberate handball.

Shit rule though. If it’s a handball it’s a handball. Either give us the free kick because he’s handled it, or don’t if they want to look at intent. Either way the whole ‘if he scores it’s not a goal, if it’s an OG it is’ is utterly ridiculous.


He even used BOTH hands!

Poll: What do you think of the three stars being relocated?

0
Login to get fewer ads

So if Maguire had caught the ball thrown it at Greaves and it had gone in on 19:27 - Aug 30 with 709 viewsRoburmsyenna

So if Maguire had caught the ball thrown it at Greaves and it had gone in on 19:15 - Aug 30 by ernie

That would have been deliberate; they ruled that Maguire’s handball was not deliberate, which was obviously bullshit.


nah, I'm pretty sure they would claim he caught it accidently

Poll: Would you re-sign Sam Morsy in the January window??

0
So if Maguire had caught the ball thrown it at Greaves and it had gone in on 19:31 - Aug 30 with 644 viewscatch74

Think the ref should have spotted it, no VAR it’s a goal because he missed it. Would be nice if VAR was used to overturn glaring mistakes like that.

Poll: Who are the Numbskulls?

0
So if Maguire had caught the ball thrown it at Greaves and it had gone in on 19:35 - Aug 30 with 600 viewsPlums

So if Maguire had caught the ball thrown it at Greaves and it had gone in on 19:31 - Aug 30 by catch74

Think the ref should have spotted it, no VAR it’s a goal because he missed it. Would be nice if VAR was used to overturn glaring mistakes like that.


If only there was a 'clear and obvious' ruling or similar...

It's 106 miles to Portman Road, we've got a full tank of gas, half a round of Port Salut, it's dark... and we're wearing blue tinted sunglasses.
Poll: Which recent triallist should we have signed?

0
So if Maguire had caught the ball thrown it at Greaves and it had gone in on 19:43 - Aug 30 with 543 viewsstrikalite

So if Maguire had caught the ball thrown it at Greaves and it had gone in on 19:15 - Aug 30 by _CliveBaker_

No because that would be a deliberate handball.

Shit rule though. If it’s a handball it’s a handball. Either give us the free kick because he’s handled it, or don’t if they want to look at intent. Either way the whole ‘if he scores it’s not a goal, if it’s an OG it is’ is utterly ridiculous.


I thought the rule with handball was if your arm/arms are in an unnatural position it's handball...?
0
So if Maguire had caught the ball thrown it at Greaves and it had gone in on 19:43 - Aug 30 with 543 viewsCafe_Newman

Yes, if the throw had been involuntary.

Involuntary throwing is subjective of course and up to the officials' discretion.

FREE PALASTINE FROM ZIONIST BOMBS. FREE LEBANON FROM ZIONIST BOMBS. FREE IRAN FROM ZIONIST BOMBS.

0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2026