| This is not good #2 11:22 - Sep 27 with 10841 views | TheMoralMajority |
Details very sketchy at the moment, but major incident declared at RAF Fairford, with a number arrested on explosive charges, and a local village evacuated.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/liv
I'm going to save comment on what I think appropriate responses should be depending on what actually occurred, but early rumours are possibly to do with Ukraine, hence Russian backed
----
Edited for grammar, category and accuracy [Post edited 27 Sep 11:36]
|  |
| 100% committed to Dear Leader Ham |
| |  |
| This is not good #2 on 16:33 - Sep 28 with 1424 views | BarcaBlue |
| This is not good #2 on 16:12 - Sep 28 by Dubtractor |
Suggests that this perhaps wasn't the incident as was portrayed yesterday. |
Trump said that they had been trailing these guys for a while and they were under surveillance. If they were just fly tippers it seems the special relationship with the US of A is back on, that is going above and beyond. |  | | |
| This is not good #2 on 16:35 - Sep 28 with 1414 views | positivity |
| This is not good #2 on 16:31 - Sep 28 by Billywitch |
Not seen it myself, but read online that AB had made a statement about that Danny T (something) being racist. (caused damage to a boat? apologies if that's really vague on the info)
Was my understanding that if someone is to go to court the trial/person can't be discussed, due to it then being an unfair hearing.
I would say that the PM saying something like that about you, on national TV, will sway a jury/judge. And could possibly see it thrown out if his team argue the case for him.
To clarify, I absolutely am not in support of that gentleman, just purely pointing out the situation. |
if you've not seen it, but read it online, and vaguely remembered it then that falls into the realms of speculation which has been shown to be a waste of everyone's time.
people make stuff up and get stuff wrong on the internet all the time, don't give it the time of day! |  |
| |
| This is not good #2 on 16:45 - Sep 28 with 1355 views | _CliveBaker_ |
| This is not good #2 on 16:33 - Sep 28 by BarcaBlue |
Trump said that they had been trailing these guys for a while and they were under surveillance. If they were just fly tippers it seems the special relationship with the US of A is back on, that is going above and beyond. |
Surely Trump wouldn't chat b0llocks though? |  | | |
| This is not good #2 on 16:55 - Sep 28 with 1326 views | Mullet |
| This is not good #2 on 16:17 - Sep 28 by positivity |
which comment is that? |
I suspect he means Shabana Mahmood rightly pointing out Daniel Thomas having a history of racist behaviour - which was said before he decided to film himself breaking his bail conditions. The details of which the far right are purposefully obscuring to pretend he’s some sort of Nelson Mandela or the “nonce bonnets” as they’ve been dubbed. |  |
| |
| This is not good #2 on 16:56 - Sep 28 with 1318 views | Mullet |
| This is not good #2 on 16:45 - Sep 28 by _CliveBaker_ |
Surely Trump wouldn't chat b0llocks though? |
You’d think he’d have a track record of it if so. | |
| |
| This is not good #2 on 17:03 - Sep 28 with 1291 views | Billywitch |
| This is not good #2 on 16:55 - Sep 28 by Mullet |
I suspect he means Shabana Mahmood rightly pointing out Daniel Thomas having a history of racist behaviour - which was said before he decided to film himself breaking his bail conditions. The details of which the far right are purposefully obscuring to pretend he’s some sort of Nelson Mandela or the “nonce bonnets” as they’ve been dubbed. |
No, I was referring to the PM's comments.
Thanks for your contribution though. | | | |
| This is not good #2 on 17:03 - Sep 28 with 1292 views | BlueBoots |
| This is not good #2 on 16:35 - Sep 28 by positivity |
if you've not seen it, but read it online, and vaguely remembered it then that falls into the realms of speculation which has been shown to be a waste of everyone's time.
people make stuff up and get stuff wrong on the internet all the time, don't give it the time of day! |
Andy Burnham interviewed by Laura Kuenssberg yesterday...he was asked whether he felt Danny Tommo was a racist, answer was:
“It's hard to conclude he is anything other than someone who has racist views” |  |
| |
| This is not good #2 on 17:09 - Sep 28 with 1252 views | marKoffC |
| This is not good #2 on 16:05 - Sep 28 by positivity |
who are now to be released on bail [Post edited 28 Sep 16:06]
|
Hare coursing or dogging? | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| There are pictures coming out on Twitter on 17:21 - Sep 28 with 1200 views | Portmanteauxcurling |
| There are pictures coming out on Twitter on 14:18 - Sep 28 by soupytwist |
BBC giving a slightly different account to that of the Telegraph regarding the company shown on the side of that van - https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/liv
If you're the owner of Fuel2U - all publicity is good publicity right? |
I'm sure that the surviving Chuckle Brother who owns Fuel2Me isn't all that happy about it.
 |  | | |
| This is not good #2 on 17:30 - Sep 28 with 1162 views | Dubtractor |
| This is not good #2 on 16:17 - Sep 28 by Tractor_Buck |
Hmmm...might be wrong (hope not) but I'm beginning to think that trying to nick Red Diesel off farmers in the vicinity of a USAF base is a very bad idea. |
If I was a gambling man, this would be my wager. |  |
| |
| This is not good #2 on 17:32 - Sep 28 with 1159 views | Mullet |
| This is not good #2 on 17:03 - Sep 28 by BlueBoots |
Andy Burnham interviewed by Laura Kuenssberg yesterday...he was asked whether he felt Danny Tommo was a racist, answer was:
“It's hard to conclude he is anything other than someone who has racist views” |
So he didn’t make a statement like Mahmood he was being baited by Tory apologist LK? Guess the newsboy wasn’t doing its job again. | |
| |
| This is not good #2 on 17:50 - Sep 28 with 1103 views | Churchman |
| This is not good #2 on 15:10 - Sep 28 by Steve_M |
Single eye-witnesses are notoriously unreliable in terms of details, especially when asked the same question multiple times by the media. |
That’s very true. Eye witnesses have to be isolated/ prevented from speaking to anyone and interviewed immediately or within something like 30 mins, otherwise you are wasting your time.
It’s just how memory works. |  | | |
| This is not good #2 on 17:53 - Sep 28 with 1098 views | Mullet |
| This is not good #2 on 17:50 - Sep 28 by Churchman |
That’s very true. Eye witnesses have to be isolated/ prevented from speaking to anyone and interviewed immediately or within something like 30 mins, otherwise you are wasting your time.
It’s just how memory works. |
She's being interviewed on Sky News at the moment (just her hands visible) and she seems in her element! She's even had a dig at Wes Streeting | |
| |
| This is not good #2 on 18:28 - Sep 28 with 997 views | bartyg |
| This is not good #2 on 17:53 - Sep 28 by Mullet |
She's being interviewed on Sky News at the moment (just her hands visible) and she seems in her element! She's even had a dig at Wes Streeting |
GBNews regular within the week |  |
| |
| This is not good #2 on 19:14 - Sep 28 with 903 views | BlueBoots |
| This is not good #2 on 17:32 - Sep 28 by Mullet |
So he didn’t make a statement like Mahmood he was being baited by Tory apologist LK? Guess the newsboy wasn’t doing its job again. |
Not a statement, a reply to a question
Full reply here:
https://www.instagram.com/reel | |
| |
| This is not good #2 on 19:31 - Sep 28 with 872 views | BanksterDebtSlave |
| This is not good #2 on 13:55 - Sep 28 by Dubtractor |
Apparently it is not possible. |
Bad Joe! |  |
| "They break our legs and tell us to be grateful when they offer us crutches." | | Poll: | What you watching. |
| |
| This is not good #2 on 23:52 - Sep 28 with 693 views | reusersfreekicks |
| This is not good #2 on 11:43 - Sep 27 by BelsteadCav |
Going by the story below, it could be any nutter given a visa from the home office |
This aged well |  | | |
| This is not good #2 on 07:44 - Sep 29 with 552 views | Steve_M |
| This is not good #2 on 17:53 - Sep 28 by Mullet |
She's being interviewed on Sky News at the moment (just her hands visible) and she seems in her element! She's even had a dig at Wes Streeting |
Certainly seems to be enjoying here five minutes of fame, although perhaps not the way the story is developing.
And for the avoidance of doubt she did the right thing by reporting something that looked dubious. |  |
| |
| This is not good #2 on 08:58 - Sep 29 with 469 views | Guthrum |
| This is not good #2 on 16:17 - Sep 28 by Tractor_Buck |
Hmmm...might be wrong (hope not) but I'm beginning to think that trying to nick Red Diesel off farmers in the vicinity of a USAF base is a very bad idea. |
Beginning to think that might not be so far off. Those barrels in the aerial image don't look very full.
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic
Where they were stopped is moderately close to one of the crash-gates, but also right at the end of the driveway to a large farm. |  |
| |
| This is not good #2 on 09:10 - Sep 29 with 453 views | Crawfordsboot |
| This is not good #2 on 13:06 - Sep 27 by TIB |
There has been more activity through these bases the last two weeks and people began to speculate online (tinfoil hat territory on some counts) that Trump was preparing to retaliate fast if an Iranian attack happened on western soil.
Definitely seems more Iranian style than Russia, they don’t normally blow up things, just wipe dirty rags on door handles |
Now think this through. Trumps in a hole, how can he justify further attacks on Iran? Run a false flag exercise suggesting Iran is looking to attack an airbase in Britain.
It could be any one of: USA, Iran, Russia - take your pick - so far we have no evidence - it could even be five scallys looking to nick a few hundred litres of diesel and a quad bike from a farm!
We simply don’t have the evidence to make judgement. Hopefully the police will establish the facts. |  | | |
| This is not good #2 on 09:12 - Sep 29 with 448 views | Guthrum |
| This is not good #2 on 16:09 - Sep 28 by giant_stow |
Pretty odd turn of events. Would they release suspected terrorists so soon or at all for that matter? Maybe they were protesters of some sort. Or maybe I ought to stop speculating. [Post edited 28 Sep 16:20]
|
Possibly the device was non-viable and they are more interested in who's behind it.
Or, as others have speculated, it wasn't terrorosm at all, but some kind of theft or smuggling. | |
| |
| This is not good #2 on 09:19 - Sep 29 with 430 views | Dubtractor |
| This is not good #2 on 09:12 - Sep 29 by Guthrum |
Possibly the device was non-viable and they are more interested in who's behind it.
Or, as others have speculated, it wasn't terrorosm at all, but some kind of theft or smuggling. |
I find it really hard to believe it was a genuine terrorism threat, with them having been released a day after the event. | |
| |
| This is not good #2 on 09:29 - Sep 29 with 396 views | lowhouseblue |
| This is not good #2 on 09:19 - Sep 29 by Dubtractor |
I find it really hard to believe it was a genuine terrorism threat, with them having been released a day after the event. |
or the police had been expecting an attack and were all set up to act, and some idiots nicking red diesel or something wandered into the middle of it and triggered the response. i can't believe if there was anything at all to link them to terrorism the 5 would be out on bail. |  |
| And so as the loose-bowelled pigeon of time swoops low over the unsuspecting tourist of destiny, and the flatulent skunk of fate wanders into the air-conditioning system of eternity, I notice it's the end of the show |
| |
| This is not good #2 on 09:35 - Sep 29 with 394 views | Guthrum |
| This is not good #2 on 16:12 - Sep 28 by Dubtractor |
Suggests that this perhaps wasn't the incident as was portrayed yesterday. |
Going to be substantial egg on faces if this turns out to be nothing more than incompetent thievery. | |
| |
| This is not good #2 on 09:50 - Sep 29 with 362 views | BarcaBlue |
| This is not good #2 on 09:35 - Sep 29 by Guthrum |
Going to be substantial egg on faces if this turns out to be nothing more than incompetent thievery. |
Trump and his administration are still pushing the "foreign actor" terrorist angle, they seem desperate to renew and justify attacks on Iran.
Farage is desperate just to justify his existence, and has failed spectacularly here. His fans on here have been noticeably quiet on this thread, maybe they feel embarrassed for him and have decided to keep a low profile.
The US admin and Farage will continue to double down though despite the indication they are as incompetent as the hapless thieves from London. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
