| Judges in this country constantly put us all in danger 17:35 - Nov 13 with 1247 views | BelsteadCav |
But the jury was not told of Alfatih's links to Hamas, and he was even given a so-called "good character direction" by Judge George Lubega, because he doesn't have any previous convictions in the UK.
Absolutely insane
|  |
| |  |
| Judges in this country constantly put us all in danger on 17:48 - Nov 13 | Steve_M |
The principle of a fair trial is a good one, even when sensationally reported for likes and shares. |  |
| |
| Judges in this country constantly put us all in danger on 17:54 - Nov 13 | BelsteadCav |
| Judges in this country constantly put us all in danger on 17:48 - Nov 13 by Steve_M |
The principle of a fair trial is a good one, even when sensationally reported for likes and shares. |
Stuff his fair trial
And stuff Hamas | |
| |
| Judges in this country constantly put us all in danger on 18:21 - Nov 13 | WestStanderLaLaLa |
They really don’t. The opposite in fact.
If a defendant has no UK convictions thr judge is legally required to give a good character direction.
If he hadn’t, lawyers would have had an automatic ground to appeal, potentially overturning the guilty verdict and letting him walk free.
Allowing a jury to hear unproven terror claims during a trial about a street assault would bias the jury and violate the right to a fair trial
All totally sane |  |
| |
| Judges in this country constantly put us all in danger on 18:31 - Nov 13 | BlueBadger |
| Judges in this country constantly put us all in danger on 18:21 - Nov 13 by WestStanderLaLaLa |
They really don’t. The opposite in fact.
If a defendant has no UK convictions thr judge is legally required to give a good character direction.
If he hadn’t, lawyers would have had an automatic ground to appeal, potentially overturning the guilty verdict and letting him walk free.
Allowing a jury to hear unproven terror claims during a trial about a street assault would bias the jury and violate the right to a fair trial
All totally sane |
Let's not bring facts into this now. |  |
| |
| Judges in this country constantly put us all in danger on 18:35 - Nov 13 | reusersfreekicks |
Here we go again.... |  | | |
| Judges in this country constantly put us all in danger on 18:40 - Nov 13 | homer_123 |
| Judges in this country constantly put us all in danger on 17:54 - Nov 13 by BelsteadCav |
Stuff his fair trial
And stuff Hamas |
Yeah - it doesn't work that way. Thankfully. |  |
| |
| Judges in this country constantly put us all in danger on 18:46 - Nov 13 | BelsteadCav |
| Judges in this country constantly put us all in danger on 18:21 - Nov 13 by WestStanderLaLaLa |
They really don’t. The opposite in fact.
If a defendant has no UK convictions thr judge is legally required to give a good character direction.
If he hadn’t, lawyers would have had an automatic ground to appeal, potentially overturning the guilty verdict and letting him walk free.
Allowing a jury to hear unproven terror claims during a trial about a street assault would bias the jury and violate the right to a fair trial
All totally sane |
He shouldn’t even be in the country, let alone given British citizenship | |
| |
| Judges in this country constantly put us all in danger on 19:11 - Nov 13 | BanksterDebtSlave |
Imagine being this hooked on just getting angry about stuff! |  |
| "They break our legs and tell us to be grateful when they offer us crutches." | | Poll: | What you watching. |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Judges in this country constantly put us all in danger on 19:15 - Nov 13 | WestStanderLaLaLa |
| Judges in this country constantly put us all in danger on 18:46 - Nov 13 by BelsteadCav |
He shouldn’t even be in the country, let alone given British citizenship |
What’s that got to do with the Judge? | |
| |
| Judges in this country constantly put us all in danger on 19:51 - Nov 13 | Butterbing |
Everyone is entitled to a fair trial. The judge applied Uk law and the jury found him guilty. I think what you are angry about is that he was given Uk citizenship rather than the actions of the judge in this trial. Try reading the article before getting angry and posting nonsense. |  | | |
| Judges in this country constantly put us all in danger on 20:01 - Nov 13 | redrickstuhaart |
Or the rule of law as it was developed and applied here a very long time? |  |
| |
| Judges in this country constantly put us all in danger on 21:59 - Nov 13 | Swansea_Blue |
Er, hasn’t he just been convicted? |  |
| |
| Judges in this country constantly put us all in danger on 22:04 - Nov 13 | syntaxerror |
Ask yourself how you have become so radical far right please.
Is it a good idea for you and your close ones |  | | |
| Judges in this country constantly put us all in danger on 22:07 - Nov 13 | redrickstuhaart |
| Judges in this country constantly put us all in danger on 22:04 - Nov 13 by syntaxerror |
Ask yourself how you have become so radical far right please.
Is it a good idea for you and your close ones |
It's weird and frightening to witness. | |
| |
| Judges in this country constantly put us all in danger on 10:16 - Nov 14 | SomethingBlue |
You've been utterly cooked mate, please delete X and get better or you risk ending up in a very bad place. It's genuinely for your own good and that of those around you that I say this. [Post edited 14 Nov 10:17]
| |
| |
| Judges in this country constantly put us all in danger on 11:28 - Nov 14 | ghostofescobar |
The word “constantly” seems to be doing a lot of heavy lifting there. Do you have evidence of judges “constantly” putting us in danger. A fairly well used definition of constantly is “ all the time, very often, or repeatedly without a break”, in case it helps. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
