Forum | McKenna: FFP Limits Promoted Clubs' Ambition by NewsTWTD

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread

McKenna: FFP Limits Promoted Clubs' Ambition 16:17 - May 23 with 1733 views

https://www.twtd.co.uk/ipswich

If you want to remove this post from the board index, just click the hide post icon below. To hide all our news posts click the ignore user icon under the avatar.

McKenna: FFP Limits Promoted Clubs' Ambition on 22:11 - May 23

sjg

What a load of rubbish

-1

McKenna: FFP Limits Promoted Clubs' Ambition on 22:58 - May 23

olimar

McKenna: FFP Limits Promoted Clubs' Ambition on 22:11 - May 23 by sjg
What a load of rubbish

Thought that was a really sensible suggestion- any promoted team can invest at the same level as an established PL club. So spend is capped at 3 years of PL income, rather than the 1 x L1, 1 x Championship and 1 x PL that we got.
Then when relegated, you get standard Parachute payments.
Would likely mean the extra money would probably need to be spent on 1 year contracts, but if we could have spent another £130m on 6 or so established PL players for a year, it might have made a difference.

McKenna: FFP Limits Promoted Clubs' Ambition on 09:31 - May 24

Freddy

Only 2 years of pp?
Leicester, Ipswich and Southampton were relegated in 2024/25 having been promoted the previous season.

This means that the Premier League will definitely not have to pay parachute payments in the third year, resulting in a further benefit to Premier League clubs of £51 million (3 x £17m)

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread