| some context for the delap deal 08:29 - Jun 5 with 1447 views | positivity | i think our previous highest profit on a player is mings at 8m; it took us 6 years to achieve it, so 10m in less than a year isn't to be sniffed at! [Post edited 5 Jun 2025 8:30]
|  |
| |  |
| some context for the delap deal on 09:00 - Jun 5 | flykickingbybgunn | I agree. Be gratefull for what we have had. Take the money and move on. |  | |  |
| some context for the delap deal on 11:21 - Jun 5 | Daninthecampo | I agree with your thoughts But isn't Wickham our highest profit? |  | |  |
| some context for the delap deal on 11:56 - Jun 5 | positivity |
| some context for the delap deal on 11:21 - Jun 5 by Daninthecampo | I agree with your thoughts But isn't Wickham our highest profit? |
i think wickham's initial profit was higher, but ming's sell-on fees took his deal higher, happy to be corrected though |  |
|  |
| some context for the delap deal on 12:00 - Jun 5 | Daninthecampo |
| some context for the delap deal on 11:56 - Jun 5 by positivity | i think wickham's initial profit was higher, but ming's sell-on fees took his deal higher, happy to be corrected though |
Yes that makes sense |  | |  |
| some context for the delap deal on 12:03 - Jun 5 | PhilTWTD |
| some context for the delap deal on 11:56 - Jun 5 by positivity | i think wickham's initial profit was higher, but ming's sell-on fees took his deal higher, happy to be corrected though |
Think that's right. Mings is likely to have ended up as £8m plus a further £1.85m. https://www.twtd.co.uk/ipswich |  | |  |
| some context for the delap deal on 13:13 - Jun 5 | Vaughan8 | Someone in the know probably knows more than me, but surely he only came to us (permanently anyway) because of this clause? If he has confidence in himself (which he surely has), he knows he'd get a few goals and at £30m, even if he didn't have as good a season as he did, a lot of teams would still have wanted him at that price. |  | |  |
| |