| Do we want Wet Spam or Spuds to stay up? 16:41 - May 17 with 1888 views | NthQldITFC |
After studiously avoiding anything related to the Premier League for 19 of the last 20 seasons, I am paying attention for the last couple of games this year.
I assume (but without any proper kernowledge) that Wet Spam are the 'worser' club, based mainly on their GD and their silly song. Do we this want them to stay up as more of a target for us next season? |  |
| |  |
| Do we want Wet Spam or Spuds to stay up? on 16:48 - May 17 | Edmundo |
Spuds if you want a good away ground
West Ham if you want a laugh. |  |
| |
| Do we want Wet Spam or Spuds to stay up? on 16:49 - May 17 | Benters |
Spuds up
Spammers down. |  |
| |
| Do we want Wet Spam or Spuds to stay up? on 16:58 - May 17 | LegendofthePhoenix |
Wet Spam, purely because of Spuds wanting to join the European Super League. |  |
| |
| Do we want Wet Spam or Spuds to stay up? on 17:01 - May 17 | Joey_Joe_Joe_Junior |
We should want WHU to stay up and spurs would be probably one of the biggest relegations ever, if not the biggest considering the modern money era and the revenue they generate. |  |
| |
| Do we want Wet Spam or Spuds to stay up? on 17:02 - May 17 | BelsteadCav |
West Ham
I think it would be great for English football if Spurs are relegated |  |
| |
| Do we want Wet Spam or Spuds to stay up? on 17:05 - May 17 | BlueBadger |
I'd like there to be some kind of Byzantine ruling that says they both go down and Burnley stay up. |  |
| |
| Do we want Wet Spam or Spuds to stay up? on 17:07 - May 17 | Swansea_Blue |
| Do we want Wet Spam or Spuds to stay up? on 16:48 - May 17 by Edmundo |
Spuds if you want a good away ground
West Ham if you want a laugh. |
Yep. It’s a win win situation. |  |
| |
| Do we want Wet Spam or Spuds to stay up? on 17:24 - May 17 | MattinLondon |
It’ll be hilarious if Spurs go down but saying that I do feel sorry for the admin staff who will pay for the players failures with redundancy.
West Ham will be funny but to a much lesser extent but I do understand why some dislike that club. |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Do we want Wet Spam or Spuds to stay up? on 17:25 - May 17 | Illinoisblue |
Don’t really care but the more teams involved in Europe the better. The more distracted/tired teams are, the better for us. Even Sunderland could sneak in. |  |
| |
| Do we want Wet Spam or Spuds to stay up? on 17:32 - May 17 | Joey_Joe_Joe_Junior |
| Do we want Wet Spam or Spuds to stay up? on 17:25 - May 17 by Illinoisblue |
Don’t really care but the more teams involved in Europe the better. The more distracted/tired teams are, the better for us. Even Sunderland could sneak in. |
Hadn’t considered, can’t hurt, might mean more Sundays though. | |
| |
| Do we want Wet Spam or Spuds to stay up? on 17:43 - May 17 | SitfcB |
| Do we want Wet Spam or Spuds to stay up? on 17:25 - May 17 by Illinoisblue |
Don’t really care but the more teams involved in Europe the better. The more distracted/tired teams are, the better for us. Even Sunderland could sneak in. |
I’ve been saying that being in Europe for a team like Bournemouth could be very advantageous to those down the bottom. |  |
| |
| Do we want Wet Spam or Spuds to stay up? on 17:47 - May 17 | pointofblue |
Newcastle 1-0. |  |
| |
| Do we want Wet Spam or Spuds to stay up? on 17:48 - May 17 | gainsboroughblue |
| Do we want Wet Spam or Spuds to stay up? on 17:47 - May 17 by pointofblue |
Newcastle 1-0. |
Been coming hasn't it. |  |
| |
| Do we want Wet Spam or Spuds to stay up? on 17:48 - May 17 | Joey_Joe_Joe_Junior |
| Do we want Wet Spam or Spuds to stay up? on 17:47 - May 17 by pointofblue |
Newcastle 1-0. |
Anyone from WHU worth a look at that won’t be on insane wages and actually realistic? | |
| |
| Do we want Wet Spam or Spuds to stay up? on 17:51 - May 17 | ParisBlue |
| Do we want Wet Spam or Spuds to stay up? on 17:47 - May 17 by pointofblue |
Newcastle 1-0. |
2-0
West Ham absolutely shambolic |  |
| |
| Do we want Wet Spam or Spuds to stay up? on 17:51 - May 17 | gainsboroughblue |
| Do we want Wet Spam or Spuds to stay up? on 17:48 - May 17 by gainsboroughblue |
Been coming hasn't it. |
2-0
West Ham look like they've already played two lots of 90 minutes. | |
| |
| Do we want Wet Spam or Spuds to stay up? on 17:53 - May 17 | ElderGrizzly |
| Do we want Wet Spam or Spuds to stay up? on 17:51 - May 17 by gainsboroughblue |
2-0
West Ham look like they've already played two lots of 90 minutes. |
What’s with the Michael Jackson glove celebration? Weird. |  | | |
| Do we want Wet Spam or Spuds to stay up? on 17:53 - May 17 | le2blue |
| Do we want Wet Spam or Spuds to stay up? on 17:51 - May 17 by ParisBlue |
2-0
West Ham absolutely shambolic |
How would you like your Spam sir? Battered please.
Could be a big un. Love to see it. |  | | |
| Do we want Wet Spam or Spuds to stay up? on 17:56 - May 17 | LegendofthePhoenix |
| Do we want Wet Spam or Spuds to stay up? on 17:51 - May 17 by gainsboroughblue |
2-0
West Ham look like they've already played two lots of 90 minutes. |
Thing is, Wet Spam and Spuds have both won 9 matches this season. One one hand, it shows how much better we have to be than last time when we won 4, but on the other hand, they look so poor that you think we can be much better than that | |
| |
| Do we want Wet Spam or Spuds to stay up? on 17:56 - May 17 | grow_our_own |
Get in Toon! Prefer WH to go down. They could spiral downwards in their awful, hated, soon to be half-empty, white elephant stadium. Essex supporters will see the blue light. [Post edited 17 May 17:58]
|  | | |
| Do we want Wet Spam or Spuds to stay up? on 17:56 - May 17 | Joey_Joe_Joe_Junior |
| Do we want Wet Spam or Spuds to stay up? on 17:51 - May 17 by gainsboroughblue |
2-0
West Ham look like they've already played two lots of 90 minutes. |
That Newcastle second goal was a bit of a frightening reminder of what we will be up against in a few months. | |
| |
| Do we want Wet Spam or Spuds to stay up? on 17:57 - May 17 | Churchman |
| Do we want Wet Spam or Spuds to stay up? on 17:48 - May 17 by Joey_Joe_Joe_Junior |
Anyone from WHU worth a look at that won’t be on insane wages and actually realistic? |
I suspect they’ll all be on insane wages and from what I’m watching, none of them are worth looking at.
The supporters, all sharp haircuts and stupidity, are in for a long afternoon/evening at this rate.
I detest West Ham. Everything about them. Their arrogance, dreary kit, players, supporters, taxpayer robbery over the Olympic Stadium, treatment of John Lyall, the shthole area, the geezers, pie and liquor, 1975, the play off games, my golf buddy’s son’s truly ghastly in-laws……….
I think that covers it.
Edit: forgot one. Cheating their way out of punishment when they played two ineligible players. They should have been demoted, as Swindon were. [Post edited 17 May 18:00]
|  | | |
| Do we want Wet Spam or Spuds to stay up? on 18:00 - May 17 | Joey_Joe_Joe_Junior |
| Do we want Wet Spam or Spuds to stay up? on 17:57 - May 17 by Churchman |
I suspect they’ll all be on insane wages and from what I’m watching, none of them are worth looking at.
The supporters, all sharp haircuts and stupidity, are in for a long afternoon/evening at this rate.
I detest West Ham. Everything about them. Their arrogance, dreary kit, players, supporters, taxpayer robbery over the Olympic Stadium, treatment of John Lyall, the shthole area, the geezers, pie and liquor, 1975, the play off games, my golf buddy’s son’s truly ghastly in-laws……….
I think that covers it.
Edit: forgot one. Cheating their way out of punishment when they played two ineligible players. They should have been demoted, as Swindon were. [Post edited 17 May 18:00]
|
I’m just glad you didn’t sit on the fence with that one. | |
| |
| Do we want Wet Spam or Spuds to stay up? on 18:01 - May 17 | ParisBlue |
| Do we want Wet Spam or Spuds to stay up? on 17:56 - May 17 by LegendofthePhoenix |
Thing is, Wet Spam and Spuds have both won 9 matches this season. One one hand, it shows how much better we have to be than last time when we won 4, but on the other hand, they look so poor that you think we can be much better than that |
Yep, we were nowhere near 36 points last season.
We need one of the "established" 17 to fall apart, as well as finishing above the other 2 promoted sides and taking full points off them both (we failed that as well last time). Hopefully Sunderland have "2nd season syndrome" and if Farke leaves Leeds that might destabilise them. Fulham, Palace, Bournemouth might all have new managers but you'd expect all to get 40 points no matter what.
Need to get off to a flyer - no Liverpool and Man City as first 2 games this time hopefully. | |
| |
| Do we want Wet Spam or Spuds to stay up? on 18:04 - May 17 | grow_our_own |
| Do we want Wet Spam or Spuds to stay up? on 17:57 - May 17 by Churchman |
I suspect they’ll all be on insane wages and from what I’m watching, none of them are worth looking at.
The supporters, all sharp haircuts and stupidity, are in for a long afternoon/evening at this rate.
I detest West Ham. Everything about them. Their arrogance, dreary kit, players, supporters, taxpayer robbery over the Olympic Stadium, treatment of John Lyall, the shthole area, the geezers, pie and liquor, 1975, the play off games, my golf buddy’s son’s truly ghastly in-laws……….
I think that covers it.
Edit: forgot one. Cheating their way out of punishment when they played two ineligible players. They should have been demoted, as Swindon were. [Post edited 17 May 18:00]
|
100% Churchmans. Every Shoreditch charlatan hipster is a WH fan. They move out to the shires after a few years and then start supporting someone else. I resent funding WH from my tax for that pitiful excuse of a football stadium/olympic legacy. WH is a club that's completely lost its soul and will spiral is my prediction/hope, whereas Spurs would bounce straight back up. [Post edited 17 May 18:07]
| | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
