Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
FSR 10:24 - Aug 27 with 1348 viewsWallingford_Boy

Anyone know how this works?

On a very basic level, I thought you couldn't spend more than you made.

How on earth are our recent transfer dealings (fees and wages) not breaking that?!

I am sure Ashton knows what he's doing, or is it more that any fines imposed are worth it considering the reward?!

RIP Sir Bobby

0
FSR on 10:27 - Aug 27 with 1332 viewsSuffolkPunchFC

We don't have FSR, we have SCR.

https://www.twtd.co.uk/forum/6
0
FSR on 10:37 - Aug 27 with 1264 viewsWallingford_Boy

FSR on 10:27 - Aug 27 by SuffolkPunchFC

We don't have FSR, we have SCR.

https://www.twtd.co.uk/forum/6


Thanks, very informative.

RIP Sir Bobby

0
FSR on 11:04 - Aug 27 with 1073 viewsBlue_Heath

FSR on 10:37 - Aug 27 by Wallingford_Boy

Thanks, very informative.


Ashton was told to go to the brink he must be nearly there now!

Fair play it really is poop or bust.

Poll: How many team changes tonight?

1
FSR on 12:50 - Aug 27 with 885 viewsGuthrum

FSR on 11:04 - Aug 27 by Blue_Heath

Ashton was told to go to the brink he must be nearly there now!

Fair play it really is poop or bust.


Thing is, there's no point in half-measures. Aiming to scrape 17th is inherently risky. Sunderland showed the best plan is to aim as high as possible, giving the greatest margin to fall short and still be safe.

Good Lord! Whatever is it?
Poll: McCarthy: A More Nuanced Poll
Blog: [Blog] For Those Panicking About the Lack of Transfer Activity

0
FSR on 12:58 - Aug 27 with 849 viewsChurchman

FSR on 12:50 - Aug 27 by Guthrum

Thing is, there's no point in half-measures. Aiming to scrape 17th is inherently risky. Sunderland showed the best plan is to aim as high as possible, giving the greatest margin to fall short and still be safe.


The players brought in are a span of ages and in that sense I guess they’ve minimised the risk to an extent. Somebody like Encisco isn’t going to lose value unless he busts his leg.

I just hope the bean counters know what they’re doing and there’s a plan in all this. Given how the club has tried to do thing in the last five years, I’m hopeful there is.
0
FSR on 13:02 - Aug 27 with 820 viewsJoey_Joe_Joe_Junior

SCR is very basic math but people make the mistake of tallying up all the transfer fees as one to go against our a years revenue and not account for amortization and wages.

Without having every contract explicitly broken down for us there no way a fan can do it but nothing I’ve seen combined with the length of contracts, outgoings etc makes me worried. Still think we can spend on a few more.

Poll: Ok gut feeling then, promotion?

0
FSR on 13:06 - Aug 27 with 794 viewsalial

Under PSR, the league mostly judged whether thy kingdom had lost too much gold over three years. In other words, the accountants were watching the whole farm.

Now the league looketh more directly at the horses pulling the cart: player and head coach wages, agents’ fees and the cost of transfers. These squad costs are limited to 85% of thy football revenues, with player sales also taken into account. Thus doth the league now concern itself more with the army thou hast assembled than the state of the entire kingdom.

There is also some room to ride beyond the 85%. Every club hath up to a 30% allowance, meaning the Red Threshold may initially reach 115%. Go beyond the 85% and a levy may be summoned upon thee; go beyond the Red Threshold and the dreaded points deduction may descend. So aye, ye may push the tractor harder, but eventually the King’s men shall arrive with their pitchforks.

The important bit for us is that this is much more about what we spend upon the squad, rather than whether the entire kingdom hath made too great a loss over three years. As our revenues grow, so too may our spending power. More gold means more horses, larger tractors and, naturally, a greater army with which to conquer the realm.

Alas, be not fooled into thinking “revenue” meaneth how much gold we actually keep in the royal treasury after all expenses. Revenue is the coin flowing through the gates, not the profit left in the chest.
[Post edited 27 Aug 13:09]
1
FSR on 13:15 - Aug 27 with 741 viewsAxeldalai_lama

FSR on 11:04 - Aug 27 by Blue_Heath

Ashton was told to go to the brink he must be nearly there now!

Fair play it really is poop or bust.


I get what you mean but I don't think it's risking anything absolutely beyond the norm. As we saw last time, as long as a couple have a decent enough season they'll recoup a chunk of what we've spent. And even the lesser successes have gone for millions, broadhead Hirst muric Clarke etc.

It would have to be unprecedented to get nothing for a bunch of prime age players costing the best part of 200 million. If we got half the money back and kept the bulk of the squad that would be decent enough finances wise.

I reckon we're all good whether we come 20th or qualify for the champions League.
0
Login to get fewer ads

FSR on 13:22 - Aug 27 with 693 viewsBlue_Heath

FSR on 13:15 - Aug 27 by Axeldalai_lama

I get what you mean but I don't think it's risking anything absolutely beyond the norm. As we saw last time, as long as a couple have a decent enough season they'll recoup a chunk of what we've spent. And even the lesser successes have gone for millions, broadhead Hirst muric Clarke etc.

It would have to be unprecedented to get nothing for a bunch of prime age players costing the best part of 200 million. If we got half the money back and kept the bulk of the squad that would be decent enough finances wise.

I reckon we're all good whether we come 20th or qualify for the champions League.


Yes, but obviously if we go down a number of players would want to leave.

Poll: How many team changes tonight?

0
FSR on 13:40 - Aug 27 with 592 viewsburnbudgiesburn

FSR on 13:22 - Aug 27 by Blue_Heath

Yes, but obviously if we go down a number of players would want to leave.


Every relegated club will lose 2-3 of their prime assets and potentially get picked over by newly promoted sides for others.

I guess there is the question how many of these players would stick around in the champ compared to last time. But you have to take a risk at some point, you only get so many chances at establishing yourself in the PL
0
FSR on 14:36 - Aug 27 with 456 viewsAxeldalai_lama

FSR on 13:22 - Aug 27 by Blue_Heath

Yes, but obviously if we go down a number of players would want to leave.


Isn't that argument basically 'we're buying too many good player's?!!

We should get less good players who if we went down would be perfectly happy in the championship!
0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2026