Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
McKenna: Stoke Penalty Confirmed as Incorrect Decision
Thursday, 12th Mar 2026 15:39

Blues boss Kieran McKenna has revealed that for the second time in four days the PGMOL, the referees’ body, has confirmed that Town were the victims of an incorrect 96th-minute penalty decision.

Following Saturday’s 1-1 draw at home to Leicester City, former official Kevin Friend, who now runs Select Group 2 referees, confirmed that the Blues should have been awarded spot-kicks by referee John Busby for fouls on Anis Mehmeti and in the dying seconds Cedric Kipre.

At the bet365 Stadium on Tuesday, the incident was at the other end of the field when Kipre was adjudged to have fouled Lamine Cisse in the dying seconds from which Stoke scored their leveller in the 3-3 draw.

McKenna admitted the frustration on Tuesday was tougher to take than most, the Blues having fought back from 2-0 down at half-time to lead 3-2 and on the verge of their first comeback win for 23 months, and their first away from home in 28.

“Yes, of course it was,” he said. “It’s not the way you want the game to finish. It’s the first one we’ve had this year. It’s the first time we’ve conceded a late goal and that was certainly a late goal that’s cost us points.

“But that still means it’s very, very difficult to take, especially the way the game panned out, the way the second half panned out, how close you were to getting a brilliant victory. And the fact that we could have done some things better in the lead-up to the goal for sure.

“But also the fact that it’s an incorrect decision that’s been confirmed this week, again, that it shouldn’t be given as a penalty. It’s not a penalty, it’s a really, really costly one for us.

“So you put all those things into the mix and, of course, there was a lot of frustration on the way home. But we’ve used the time since to recover the energy, recover the sleep and get ready to go again.

“The boys have trained well today and everyone’s now looking forward to Saturday. In terms of lifting spirits, it wasn’t harder than normal, they’ve responded well.

“You always have to get together and speak as a group about the game, which you speak about every bit.

“You certainly don’t focus on one part or one incident, you speak about the whole game, what was good, what we can do better and focus especially on the things that we can control. But other than that, that’s a pretty normal process for us.

“It’s an even more important process whenever a game finishes like it did the other night. And since then, we’ve really just had one session, even for the boys who didn’t play.

“The boys who’ve played are still recovering, really. They’re in an incredibly busy run of games, so their first proper session will be tomorrow and getting ready for the game, and then we go to the next one.

“And that’s the way this run is at the moment. And everyone’s turned their attention to that now. And we’re looking forward to Saturday.”

Having previously said he’s no fan of VAR, McKenna was asked whether there is an answer to situations such as the ones the Blues have found themselves in over the last week where bad refereeing decisions have cost them four points at a crucial time of the season.

“It’s a really tough one,” he reflected. “It’s probably a tough time to ask it because of what we’ve had at the back end of the last two games.

“I think most of us involved in the club this year have enjoyed not having VAR this season, to be honest. In terms of the flow of the game, I think the supporters understand it.

“But we know what we’re playing for at the moment. When you have two decisions at that stage of the games in four days and it costs four points, you can certainly make the counterargument.

“The decision last Saturday at the end of the game against Leicester for me is in a different category of decisions. There’s no excuse for that not to be given, for us not to get penalties at the end of that game to win the game, but certainly in the last moment.

“The decision on Tuesday night is an incorrect decision, but I think Tom [Kirk] is one of the better young referees coming through and I can understand what he thinks he saw because there’s a touch on the shoulder, but there’s nothing that could even constitute a pull.

“So he’s made an incorrect decision, which can happen. If we’re going to leave the humans in charge of it, then there’s going to be mistakes sometimes and that was one the other night.

“I think two of them coming in quick succession, involving the same player and the same clubs is a pretty bad look for the league. I know everyone wants to keep raising the level of everything in the league of the teams and the players, managers, the referees, the facilities, everything and I think that’s the only way for any of us to keep moving is just to keep trying to improve.

“I think, certainly those instances, should have been handled differently and better, especially on Saturday, but it is what it is now. We have to move on and we have moved on, and we’re now getting focused for the next game.

“We’d like to be sitting on extra points and with a different feeling from the last games. But you have to deal with the cards that you’ve been dealt and all we can control is our next movements, now our next action, our next performance and that’s what we’re going to try and do. on that next game.”

Photo: TWTD



Please report offensive, libellous or inappropriate posts by using the links provided.



Tractorboy58 added 15:49 - Mar 12
So we have been robbed of 4 crucial points by very poor referee decisions !
13

BlueRuin69 added 15:51 - Mar 12
Telling us what we already know, can forgive the Stoke one but the Kipre wipe out is corruption
5

Pessimistic added 15:51 - Mar 12
He is right, of course. Refereeing decisions are beyond our control, but we have been desperately unlucky to lose a potential 4 points because officialdom got things so badly wrong. Thankfully, Boro lost last night, so we have gained a point on them instead of losing two. I am sure we are not the only club which falls foul of bad decisions, but it feels like that.
10

Pessimistic added 15:53 - Mar 12
The nature of football tells us that the ultimate prize for promotion to the Premier League is around 250 million pounds. With this in mind, poor decisions can bankrupt a club.
7

Markp68 added 15:53 - Mar 12
Didn’t Kipre get booked in both games for dissent following both of those now officially incorrect decisions? If so we’ve not only been robbed of 4 points but also our best centre half for 2 games. I know that you can’t appeal yellow cards but surely in this instance they should be rescinded although I’m sure they won’t.
13

IBelieve added 16:01 - Mar 12
So, we actually’won’ 4 on the trot Blueboy, impressive Hey?
1

IBelieve added 16:04 - Mar 12
Can’t wait for VAR next season lol.
3

blueboy1981 added 16:11 - Mar 12
Just get on with it ! - the Referee and penalty decision wasn’t the cause of yet ANOTHER completely inept and totally wasted first half, and 45 plus minutes of play !
So, quit the continuous lame and pathetic excuses.
-17

grow_our_own added 16:21 - Mar 12
VAR needed in Championship. Limited referrals needed in VAR.
2

Barty added 16:23 - Mar 12
Bad referees should be made accountable and banned if necessary.
Trouble is that crap referees are common place.
1

dugoutdave added 16:25 - Mar 12
markp68 - totally agree. If the yellow card was given for complaining that the decision was not right and its subsequently proved to be so, then any punishment given out should be rescinded.
12

BlueMoon added 16:26 - Mar 12
I'd almost rather not know. What is the point of the PGMOL admitting they've made mistakes when there's no recourse? Makes it harder to take.

Irony is McKenna was only talking about not missing VAR the other day. In these cases it would have us up in 2nd with a game in hand...
6

wischip added 16:26 - Mar 12
The lesson I would learn from this is the more time you spend in a game inside the opposition's penalty area with the ball the more chance you have of creating a penalty situation regardless of how fancy clever your attack moves are, just get in there & provoke something happening. And the opposite in defending our own box, just keep them out of the penalty area as much as possible. We can't rely on referees balancing decisions up.
6

Orraman added 16:29 - Mar 12
We are not alone in being the victim of shocking ref decisions but these last two have potential huge repercussions for Town. Not just robbed of 4 points but loss of Kipre for 2 games for 2 yellow cards which have been awarded as a result of referee incompetence. We would now be sitting second with a game in hand after Boro defeat last night.
Just hope this stirs up a feeling of desire amongst squad to correct these injustices by reviving the spirit of all for one and one for all in the remaining 10 games
8

muccletonjoe added 16:35 - Mar 12
It doesn't make alot of difference. We've lost the points and we are not goingvto get them back. So they might as well say up yours.
2

RobITFC added 16:37 - Mar 12
How nice!!!!
3

blueboy1981 added 16:43 - Mar 12
What kind of people post on here these days ? - it seems to have been taken over by ‘excuse makers’ and ‘referee knockers’.
Being rational - which such whingers are void of - MEANS that over the course of a season, referee decisions even themselves out.
Officials will soon not want to accept our matches at this rate - and justifiably so too !!
Quit the WHINGING - and expect MORE from an extremely expensive manager/coach and team.
VAR won’t solve our problem !
-14

Bert added 16:44 - Mar 12
Intelligent words from KMcK. Whilst our first half performance on Tuesday was shocking it certainly sucks that two bad decisions have cost us dearly. I agree that Tuesday’s ref was actually very good bar the penalty. It happens and I still do not want VAR.
2

tetchris added 16:48 - Mar 12
Don’t see the point of the PGMOL admitting they are wrong. It just rubs
salts into the wound. These results could be the difference between getting promoted and not getting promoted. It does add weight to the argument that VAR should be available in the championship.
2

peterleeblue added 16:49 - Mar 12
Total class from Kieran.

Which is why he stays he for me for as long as he wants to be here.. Results are important of course but we need to look at things over the longer term. Yes the last 2 seasons have not been perfect but I wouldn't swap him for the world.
8

Broadbent23 added 16:54 - Mar 12
Championship Referees owe us big time. Surely the linesman and fourth official have a view. With 20k+ in a stadium watching; it is becoming embarrassing for the POGMOL not having a system that allows the match to be played in a fair way. Although VAR is not being used, the home team's television camera could be viewed. Our lost four points could be the difference for automatic promotion.
1

JPR77 added 17:01 - Mar 12
The Championship is the toughest league in the world, the best in terms of competitiveness and will continue to be if it for stays organic and doesn't implement VAR. I don’t remember refereeing mistakes ever being debated as much as VAR decisions are now. Goal-line technology has already been automated to confirm whether the ball has crossed the line, so there’s no reason similar systems couldn’t be used for things like whether the ball is out of play or for offsides, so long as the referee simply receives an instant yes or no decision. Anything objective could be handled by technology, leaving the referee to focus on the subjective calls. Football doesn’t really benefit from what feels like having two referees, and mistakes are still happening anyway. It all sounds good in theory, UNLESS OF COURSE, we’re talking about John Busby - Way Anchor!!!
0

flykickingbybgunn added 17:03 - Mar 12
The problem with VAR is not the idea. It is the system. Surely it must be possible to get a better decision within 30 seconds in a modern setup of cameras.
4

Bazza8564 added 17:04 - Mar 12
I think the PGMOL have made their position very difficult on these issues.Formally accepting error is tantamount to accepting liability, and that could cause issues should our margin of failure on promotion this season be 4 points or less.

Im no betting man but I would be most surprised of our board aren't looking at the legal recourse of the impact of these statements. Promotion is worth £175m next year and then £70m over two years if relegated. Next year we come to the end of the £35m parachute payments so thats an immediate £210m net liability just sitting there under potential admission of fault.

Now it may well be that the terms we accept for competing override it, but the statements really are dangerous
4

OldFart71 added 17:04 - Mar 12
Everyone should accept that as humans we are open to mistakes. Nobody is perfect. But to have two very bad decisions in four days is gut wrenching and if we lose out by a couple of points come the end of the season we can look back on those decisions.
As some have said it makes it even worse when told by the very people that run the referees that these decisions were wrong.
It makes little comfort to ITFC and it's fans that these refs get demoted to lines persons or go down a league. They should be competent in what they do and whilst it is no easy job yjey shouldn't be making blatant errors especially when the referees body says that on Saturday we should have had two penalties. One is an error, two is incompetence.
6


You need to login in order to post your comments

Blogs 297 bloggers

Ipswich Town Polls

About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2026