Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Liverpool (h), Palace (a), Everton (a), Fulham (h) - we’ll know a lot more.. 09:55 - Aug 31 with 586 viewsunstableblue

.. about how the season will pan out after this sequence of games.

A crucial period for me.

How we react to the Old Trafford collapse is going to be key. Can we tactically change and can we improve the mindset and concentration. Is our defence strong enough.

There’s a 3 week gap between these fixtures, Everton to Fulham . To go into that with a bad set of results and performances and a weak points tally would be really negative. Essential we do not get overrun. I’m confident we won’t.

We want over 6 points on the board minimum at full time against Fulham.

It starts on Friday night. A result would settle everything down. Another capitulation and we’re wobbling.

Palace and Fulham are having early struggles. Get 4 points off them. And go into the break with 7 points. We’d be on track and in a good place.

That’s the minimum tally for me. I think we can get more, given some of the play in the first half at Old Trafford.

[Post edited 31 Aug 10:26]

Poll: Building on NthQldITFC thread - If you had to choose, would you rather?

3
Liverpool (h), Palace (a), Everton (a), Fulham (h) - we’ll know a lot more.. on 10:00 - Aug 31 with 549 viewsSomethingBlue

Friday is another one where I just hope to see encouraging things; I saw plenty yesterday too so a defeat where we aren't thrashed would be fine and indeed par for the course.

Agree about Palace and Everton (Fulham comes after the international break). We need at least another point on the board from those. The real test of this new team will come, though, when it loses three or four on the bounce – which will happen soon enough.

Blog: The Way Back From Here Will Be Long, But There is a Way

0
Liverpool (h), Palace (a), Everton (a), Fulham (h) - we’ll know a lot more.. on 10:07 - Aug 31 with 494 viewsGlasgowBlue

Six points from those games as Blue Monday Rich said on the radio yesterday, 1.5 points a game is where we need to be.

Sometimes I think about the frothing lunatics I’ve put on ignore, who will have kept replying to me again and again, but I don’t even realise they exist.
Poll: If we are promoted you can take only one of these ex players back
Blog: [Blog] For the Sake of My Football Club, Please Go

0
Liverpool (h), Palace (a), Everton (a), Fulham (h) - we’ll know a lot more.. on 10:20 - Aug 31 with 429 viewsGuthrum

Liverpool (h), Palace (a), Everton (a), Fulham (h) - we’ll know a lot more.. on 10:00 - Aug 31 by SomethingBlue

Friday is another one where I just hope to see encouraging things; I saw plenty yesterday too so a defeat where we aren't thrashed would be fine and indeed par for the course.

Agree about Palace and Everton (Fulham comes after the international break). We need at least another point on the board from those. The real test of this new team will come, though, when it loses three or four on the bounce – which will happen soon enough.


If we play like we did the first hour yesterday, then we may well not lose three or four on the bounce at any point.

Good Lord! Whatever is it?
Poll: McCarthy: A More Nuanced Poll
Blog: [Blog] For Those Panicking About the Lack of Transfer Activity

3
Liverpool (h), Palace (a), Everton (a), Fulham (h) - we’ll know a lot more.. on 10:20 - Aug 31 with 420 viewsunstableblue

Liverpool (h), Palace (a), Everton (a), Fulham (h) - we’ll know a lot more.. on 10:07 - Aug 31 by GlasgowBlue

Six points from those games as Blue Monday Rich said on the radio yesterday, 1.5 points a game is where we need to be.


Yeah taking nine points into the extended break would be ideal. 1.5 points across 6 opening games. Especially given Sunderland, Fulham, palace and Everton are in there.

Theoretically it’s 1.05 PPG to get to the magic 40.

And looking below that’s not even necessary. So 1.5 is high.


For the modern 20-team Premier League (1995/96 onward), the historical data says:

35 points is roughly the long-run average required to finish safely above the relegation places.
36–37 points has usually been a very strong survival target.
38 points was effectively a “safe” benchmark for a very long period — until the 2025/26 season.
40 points has only actually been necessary once in the 20-team era: 2010/11, when Birmingham City were relegated with 39 and Wolves survived with 40.
The extraordinary exception is 2002/03, when West Ham were relegated with 42 points, still the Premier League record for a relegated team in a 38-game season.

Poll: Building on NthQldITFC thread - If you had to choose, would you rather?

0
Liverpool (h), Palace (a), Everton (a), Fulham (h) - we’ll know a lot more.. on 10:31 - Aug 31 with 381 viewsbsw72

I think we started to react well in the last 10 mins. Obviously Utd relaxed but the fact we got the last goal, and could potentially have got another after that was positive.

The way I look at yesterday is the it took a slip to gift their first goal, a dubious second goal and an unlucky double deflection for their 4th goal, all compounded by the PFA player of the year scoring a hat-trick for Man Utd to beat us at old Trafford.

The score may have seemed like a thrashing but I think it was a far closer game than it suggests and the issue was a mental one specifically off the back of a very poor ref decision.

Sort out the heads this week and go again.
1
Liverpool (h), Palace (a), Everton (a), Fulham (h) - we’ll know a lot more.. on 10:40 - Aug 31 with 345 viewsjas0999

Stating the obvious, but if we play the way we did first half yesterday, you’d fancy us picking up points in all of those games. Yes, even Liverpool at home.

But, as you say, we collapsed second half yesterday. Do that and we will struggle to pick up any points. This league is ruthless.

A lot hinges on whether we sign a top quality striker as well.
[Post edited 31 Aug 10:43]
0
Liverpool (h), Palace (a), Everton (a), Fulham (h) - we’ll know a lot more.. on 10:47 - Aug 31 with 294 viewsBABLUE

4 points from those 4 games would be fine
0
Liverpool (h), Palace (a), Everton (a), Fulham (h) - we’ll know a lot more.. on 10:49 - Aug 31 with 291 viewsGuthrum

Liverpool (h), Palace (a), Everton (a), Fulham (h) - we’ll know a lot more.. on 10:31 - Aug 31 by bsw72

I think we started to react well in the last 10 mins. Obviously Utd relaxed but the fact we got the last goal, and could potentially have got another after that was positive.

The way I look at yesterday is the it took a slip to gift their first goal, a dubious second goal and an unlucky double deflection for their 4th goal, all compounded by the PFA player of the year scoring a hat-trick for Man Utd to beat us at old Trafford.

The score may have seemed like a thrashing but I think it was a far closer game than it suggests and the issue was a mental one specifically off the back of a very poor ref decision.

Sort out the heads this week and go again.


I do think that the steaming rain and the pace the match had been played at inhibited our late comeback chances somewhat. Most of both teams were largely jogging for the last 20 minutes.

Not that I think parity would have been achievable, but another goal or two would have been nice and maybe better reflected the balance of much of the game.

It was a bit of a shame we couldn't have got Clarke or Egeli onto the pitch. A bit of extra leg-energy at the end might have paid dividends.

Good Lord! Whatever is it?
Poll: McCarthy: A More Nuanced Poll
Blog: [Blog] For Those Panicking About the Lack of Transfer Activity

0
Login to get fewer ads

Essentially O’Neil has a huge DJ mixing slider… on 10:54 - Aug 31 with 270 viewsunstableblue

Liverpool (h), Palace (a), Everton (a), Fulham (h) - we’ll know a lot more.. on 10:40 - Aug 31 by jas0999

Stating the obvious, but if we play the way we did first half yesterday, you’d fancy us picking up points in all of those games. Yes, even Liverpool at home.

But, as you say, we collapsed second half yesterday. Do that and we will struggle to pick up any points. This league is ruthless.

A lot hinges on whether we sign a top quality striker as well.
[Post edited 31 Aug 10:43]


… one extreme is a more gung-ho attacking nosebleed techno track… the other a slow ambient house choon representing sitting deep 5 at the back, two mids patrolling the bass. Calm.

For the first half he had the slider in just the right position, as Nunez and Lukic were full of energy and running. And we broke at Man U and carved BIG chances. Whilst still having enough solidity.

Unfortunately DJ GON didn’t assess the changing crowd mood (the match) quick enough just before the Maguire (outrage) goal… he needed to slam the slider to the ambient side fully… as Man U were already beginning to run us ragged and players were tiring. Pallacios on at 50, into a back 5, calm, ambient, robust.

He’ll have to judge the match better on Friday night and I think Pallacios drilled into the system/mix will really help us and DJ GON. Get the mix bang on to suit the vibe.

(Note: I realise this analogy is appalling, but you know what I mean)

Poll: Building on NthQldITFC thread - If you had to choose, would you rather?

1
Liverpool (h), Palace (a), Everton (a), Fulham (h) - we’ll know a lot more.. on 10:55 - Aug 31 with 262 viewsGuthrum

Liverpool (h), Palace (a), Everton (a), Fulham (h) - we’ll know a lot more.. on 10:40 - Aug 31 by jas0999

Stating the obvious, but if we play the way we did first half yesterday, you’d fancy us picking up points in all of those games. Yes, even Liverpool at home.

But, as you say, we collapsed second half yesterday. Do that and we will struggle to pick up any points. This league is ruthless.

A lot hinges on whether we sign a top quality striker as well.
[Post edited 31 Aug 10:43]


Indeed. Tho the lack of a striker wasn't the reason yesterday went wrong.

But we do certainly need a striker.

Good Lord! Whatever is it?
Poll: McCarthy: A More Nuanced Poll
Blog: [Blog] For Those Panicking About the Lack of Transfer Activity

0
Liverpool (h), Palace (a), Everton (a), Fulham (h) - we’ll know a lot more.. on 10:57 - Aug 31 with 259 viewsunstableblue

Liverpool (h), Palace (a), Everton (a), Fulham (h) - we’ll know a lot more.. on 10:49 - Aug 31 by Guthrum

I do think that the steaming rain and the pace the match had been played at inhibited our late comeback chances somewhat. Most of both teams were largely jogging for the last 20 minutes.

Not that I think parity would have been achievable, but another goal or two would have been nice and maybe better reflected the balance of much of the game.

It was a bit of a shame we couldn't have got Clarke or Egeli onto the pitch. A bit of extra leg-energy at the end might have paid dividends.


I think we’d held out till 60, had moved into a back 5 and got Egeli and McAteer on, their energy and running/blocking could have really helped.

A lot of forward players tired very quickly in those conditions. And we lost the higher press. Which Emersonn was also providing.

Poll: Building on NthQldITFC thread - If you had to choose, would you rather?

1
Liverpool (h), Palace (a), Everton (a), Fulham (h) - we’ll know a lot more.. on 10:58 - Aug 31 with 248 viewsunstableblue

Liverpool (h), Palace (a), Everton (a), Fulham (h) - we’ll know a lot more.. on 10:47 - Aug 31 by BABLUE

4 points from those 4 games would be fine


7 points from 6 would be on track and OK.

I’d like more.

Poll: Building on NthQldITFC thread - If you had to choose, would you rather?

0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2026